|
The "Modern" Church - The Downfall
of our Race
By Mrs. Rachel Pendergraft
Martin Luther King Day is over until next year
and we are now in the midst of a celebration of Negro culture. White children
across the land will be forced to under go hour after hour of non-sense about
the great Black race. They will be taught that the powerful Greek military
leader Hannibal was black, that Cleopatra was black, and most likely many will
be taught that Jesus Christ him self was a man of color – all the while
ignoring historical evidence to the contrary. The many inventions of the Negro
will be held in high esteem; yes, inventions, such as the table or boot. One
resource guide for Black History Month lists these two inventions of the Black
race having been patented in late 1800. Gee, what did our people do for
thousands of years without tables or boots? I shudder to think of it. Charles
Drew will be heralded as the savior of millions with his studies in blood
plasma. Yet, was it the 90% white part of him or the 10% Negro part of him that
possessed such genius. We could go on, but I think you get the point.
But let’s get back to Martin Luther King. Is
it within the realm of a normal white man’s life to eagerly prop up the heroes
of another people? NO. And what must be done about this so-called lack of
integrity; preach it from the mountaintop, preach it from the valley, but most
of all preach it from the pulpit. And this is precisely what they have done.
The church is a storehouse of power. Millions
of good people make their weekly trek to The Church to receive their
instruction. Their influence on even those who don’t attend regular services
is overwhelming. The majority of people, even today, don’t really make their
mind up about a subject until they hear the church’s point of view. After all,
they want to live their life in good conscience. And it is these people who are
the prey of the wicked one.
Unfortunately, the churches today are pastored
by sheep not shepherds. 99.9% of all preachers in any country on any continent
have no business speaking or teaching in the church. My 10-year-old daughter is
more qualified than these are. She knows from where our white race came, that
our lord and Savior was a Judahite not a Khazar Jew, that race mixing is wrong,
abortion is murder, and homosexuality is an abomination. She knows that men are
to be good daddies and providers and women to be mommies and teachers of our
children; the U.N. wants to destroy and control white nations, non-white
immigration is ruining our people, and the right to own and bear arms should
never be given up as its our gift from God – if we can keep it and that above
all we must focus our energy on love for our people. Do your children know these
things? If not why? If you are a parent, it’s your job. And if they don’t
know these things, forgive me if I hurt your feelings, but you have failed as a
parent and should immediately begin to correct the situation. Preachers are like
parents, but most church leaders don’t deserve the title of God’s spokesman.
Martin Luther King Day is not longer a day of
Liberal celebration, but is praised even in the sacred meeting places of the
Living God. Read the innocuous words of the following Christian
"leader" Tom Minnery, vice president of public policy at Focus on the
Family, one of the nation’s largest Christian organizations.
"Though it has
been nearly four decades, the words "I have a dream" still resound in
our national spirit. In the famous speech King delivered during the 1963 Civil
Rights March on Washington, D.C., his words talk about a dream for America.
Christians should use Martin Luther King Day to assess whether they are working
toward racial harmony. We need the boldness that was demonstrated in the civil
rights movement to influence the culture for God. Pastors need to understand
that righteousness may require them to be divisive, to be controversial again,
as Martin Luther King was back in the 1960’s"
The Rev. Ralph Kelly, who is touted as having
spent years teaching and equipping pastors for the same group says;
"Racism is a sin. We’re going to
address it from our pulpits, whether we’re African American or white American.
We’re going to address this because we know that in God’s eye, racism is sin
and it needs to go away."
Notice, that the Rev. Kelly says, "we
know that in God’s eye, racism is sin." How does he know that in God’s
eye racism is sin? Has he had a personal conversation with him? Did he receive a
revelation that the rest of us are not privy to?
It is actually not that difficult to find out
what is in "God’s eye" if we have an earnest desire to know the
truth. Where do we begin? How are we to know for certain what God says on the
subject? The Bible says that the Word is God and there is life in the word. We
only need to look in scripture to find out what is or isn’t in God’s eye.
In Genesis we read, "In the beginning
God created the heavens and the Earth". "And the earth was
without form, and void; and darkness was on the face of the deep" The
darkness that was on the face of the deep, and the earth being without form, and
void, are rather interesting passages. The writings of the ancients, in the
areas of early Hebrew, tell us that the condition that made the earth without
form, and void, was the hand of God placing gigantic forces in operation, to
void great evil and tremendous transgression and to bring catastrophe and
judgment and elimination of people from earth bondage. The Webster dictionary
tells you the word void means the aftermath of judgment by great power. To void
a thing is to remove or efface it as it was. You may void an entry in your
checkbook, it doesn’t mean the entry was never there, but that you are
returning it to its original account. We are first told that God made the
heavens and the earth, and then we are told that it was voided. Could this be
due to the fact that the Almighty cast one third of the rebellious angels to
another realm where they corrupted his creation? In the book of Ephesians it
tells us that we are pilgrims in the earth and pre-existed with God. In Jeremiah
4:23, Jeremiah, through a vision, remembering his previous home with God says,
"I beheld the earth, and, lo, it BECAME without form and was void; the
heavens had no light. I beheld the mounts, and they trembled, and the hills did
move. I beheld, and , lo, there was no man, for the birds of the heavens had
fled. I beheld the fruitful place that was a wilderness, and all the cities were
broken down from the presence of God and His anger." This certainly
explains ancient ruins in the lower strata (layers) of the earth, artifacts and
tools that are millions of years old.
Adam was not the first man. In Genesis 1:26-28
we read, "Male and female created He them" and God said to
them, "Be fruitful and multiply, and REplenish the Earth." This
was on the 6th day or 6th AGE of creation. There had been
an earlier creation, which was destroyed of which we have already spoken. The
male and female, speaking plurally, were to REplenish what had been destroyed.
Plenish is an obsolete English word that means "to fill" They
were to REfill the earth. You can not refill what has not already been filled.
For instance, you can fill the ice cube tray for the first time, but to REfill
the tray denotes its earlier state of having ONCE been filled.
The new creation was to be fruitful and
multiply and this occurred millions of years ago. Now you know why there are to
be found the remains of Negroes, Asians, and other similar peoples that date
back to 1,500,000 years old. Yet no white man or woman has ever been found to
date further back than 6000 years.
And then in the seventh age, God rested and
his creation multiplied and again spread across the face of the earth.
There are two Hebrew word translated to
"create". One is bara, which means to make something; like an artist
might sculpt something. The other is "yatstar" which means to bring
forth out of one’s self. God created the red, yellow and black races and gave
them dominion over the animals of the earth and yes, he did and still does love
his creation.
You may now ask, well where does Adam and Eve
come into the picture? We will find them appearing on the 8th day.
When God said, I have no man to till the soil. In Strong's concordance
"till" means to serve, to set in order, compel, bring to pass, to
supervise. God had already created the red man, the yellow man, and the
black man, but he wanted someone to compel his earlier creation to a productive
work., to rule, to bring order to the earth. And he created (yatstar) brought
forth issue – his child, his genetic legacy. He called them Adam and then
separated the woman from Adam and she was now called Eve – the mother of all
living (spiritually).
Adam and Eve were not the progenitors of all
races. Isn’t it amusing how on one hand the modern church fights against the
idea of evolution and than on the other hand wants us to believe that all races
evolved from one source.
Now why didn’t God give a woman of another
race of the earlier creation to Adam? If she is to be "but the servant
of the man" as Whartons Laws from the first half of the 19th
century says, than any race would have been fine. It doesn’t take a genius to
clean a home, mend clothes, fix a meal, etc. But God did not want a help-mate
for Adam he wanted a help-MEET. Meet means "a counterpart, a person very
closely like or corresponding to another person." In the dictionary we
find the word meet means fitting, made to fit, akin (of one kin; related, having
similar qualities, suitable, appropriate, proper. Rushdoony’s Institutes of
Biblical Law state that a woman’s normal sphere is that of advisor and
counselor. A true help-meet is man’s image and must mirror his image. She must
be of the same race.
The facts stated above have been taught and
regarded as truth by Gods people throughout the centuries although at times when
it was disregarded it brought God’s wrath.
In this last age we begin seeing this truth
destroyed. Justin D. Fulton, a Boston minister popular in liberal circles wrote
in 1869:
"Much is said against amalgamation, as
thought it were a crime. There is no crime in it or about it. There is much of
prejudice, but no crime. If a white man loves a black woman, there is no law in
God’s code forbidding the union. God made of one blood all nations of men to
dwell on the face of the earth. Complexions may differ, owing to climate, or
temperament, (evolution) but the blood is the same. The races have a common
Father in God. In this intermingling of races, coming to this land from all
climes, we perceive the seedling of a glorious hope. The future American is to
be the product of this blending of the distinctive features of all the various
races of earth. Against this result there is an immense amount of prejudice; but
in Europe it does not exist. Many a white man has found his help-mate in a black
woman, and many more will find help-mates from the same source."
He continues in his assault upon white women
with the following:
"Think of Miss Anthony (Susan B.) and Mrs. Stanton in
the train of George Francis, perambulating the country in favor of the ballot.
These are the leaders; but let it not be forgotten that they sided against the
ballot for the Negro, and proved their utter worthlessness and untrustworthiness
by trailing the banner committed to their keeping in the slime of a convention
which went for the repudiation of the national debt, the defeat of the party of
progress, and for the overthrow of the Republicans (Republicans at that time
were in the forefront of full Negro-White equality). Had woman possessed the
ballot, and had the course pursued by the leaders of this movement exercised an
influence over the majority, this wonderful victory over the rebellious spirits
of the land would not been achieved; but, in its stead,
the stars and bars would have resumed their way, and the stars and stripes,
which now kiss the breeze, and greet the rising hopes of uncounted millions,
would have been furled in gloom and night."
This liberal traitor first encourages the
practice of white men taking Negresses for help-mates and then bashes the early
suffragists for their stand against Negro voting rights. He warns that if the
majority of the suffragists had had their way, by their influence, the South
would not have been destroyed. Yet, to destroy the relationship between white men and
women, the re-writers of history imply that these women ushered in a new era of
racial equality, when in fact, the majority of them (albeit a few Jewesses) were
white Christian women who worked to strengthen the family in a time when Jewish
influences were having a very negative impact on the nation. (How this Christian
woman’s movement was hijacked will be discussed in a later article.)
God himself ordained the white man and woman
to have the pre-eminence and from the beginning Satan has been out to subvert
their authority in the earth by any means necessary. He instills within the
created races the desire to rule or supervise which they are incapable of doing.
God’s sons and daughters are to be a blessing to the world. It is through the
compassion of the white race that education, health care, law and order have
been brought to the pre-Adamic non-white creation. When non-whites attempt to
usurp the authority of the white race, they are hurting themselves in the long
run.
Examples within the Bible of God’s view
toward the mixing of the races:
Genesis 6:9 These are the generations of Noah:
Noah was a just man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God.
Perfect means without blemish. "Generation" in the Hebrew concordance
means descent, family, history, birth. Noah was perfect in his descent. He was
of pure seed and untainted; his wife also. It is interesting to note here that
one of the signs of the last days is that it will be like in the days of Noah
– rampant race-mixing.
Genesis Chapter 16,17 God tells Abram and
Sarai that they will have a son although both are very old.. God makes a
covenant with Abram changing his name to Abraham and tells him, "I will
make thee exceeding fruitful, and I will make nations of thee, and kings shall
come out of thee." And then he changes Abram's racially pure wife’s name
to Sarah and says, "I will bless her and she shall be a mother of nations;
kings of people shall be of her."
Genesis Chapter 24: Abraham, knowing he is to
die soon, makes his servant swear an oath that (Sarah is dead by this time) he
will insure that Isaac, Abraham’s and Sarah’s son, will not take a wife from
the daughters of the Canaanites, but "thou shalt go unto my country, and to
my kindred, and take a wife unto my unto my son Isaac." The word kindred
means "lineage, offspring, family". He wanted his son to have a
racially pure wife
Genesis Chapter 26: Essau and Jacob are born
to Isaac and Rebecca. Esau sells his birthright and then marries a local
non-white girl. "And Esau was forty years old when he took to wife
Judith the daughter of Beeri the Hittite, and Bashemath the daughter of Elon the
Hittite; Which were a grief of mind unto Isaac and to Rebecca. Chapter 28:
Isaac and Rebecca tells Jacob not to take a wife of the daughters of Canaan, but
rather go to [the house] family or kindred of his mother’s people. He is to
travel to his mother’s land and find a wife from among his own race.
This was not a simple matter of religious differences or they would have
commanded Jacob to covert a local girl and then take her as wife. No, he was to
have a racially pure marriage.
God’s people were to remain racially pure
and were to retain rulership. Deuteronomy Chapter 17: 15...thou mayest not
set a stranger over thee, which is not thy brother. (stranger means not of
thy kindred) Jeremiah Chapter 30: And their nobles shall be of themselves,
and their governor shall proceed from the midst of them"
Moses presents the 10 Commandments (there are
other laws besides these) Among the 10 Commandments is the 8th.
Thou shall not commit adultery. But you may say to yourself, doesn’t this
have to do with cheating spouses. No. That is covered under the 10th,
which says....thou shalt not covet thy neighbor’s wife. There are
always "root" words that form a foundation for a particular word such
as adulterate. When you look at the meaning of this word, you will understand
why this refers to miscegenation. Look in the dictionary. Adulterate: to
make inferior, impure, not genuine, by adding a poor or improper substance.
Pastor J.V. Foster has this comment:
Interracial marriage has ALWAYS been defined
as adultery. Jer. 3:8-9 gives us light on this. "And I say, when for all
causes whereby backsliding Israel committed adultery I had put her away, and
given her a bill of divorce: yet her treacherous sister Judah feared not, but
went and played the harlot also. And it came to pass through the lightness of
her whoredom, that she defiled the land, and committed adultery with stones and
with stocks." The words "stones" and "stocks" are
physical seed and idol worship. God was referring to a nation that had
intermarried physically, and intermarried philosophically.
Leviticus Chapter 20: "I am the lord
your God, which have separated you from other people." The word
separated means "to divide, distinguish, and differ.
Ezra Chapter 2: The priests had intermarried
with the strange daughters of the land and when their racial purity was
questioned and was found to be polluted they were cast off. "These
sought their register among those that were reckoned by genealogy, but they were
not found: therefore were they, as polluted, put from the priesthood."
Numbers Chapter 25: And Israel abode in
Shittim, and the people began to commit whoredom* with the daughters of Moab.
(The Moabites were descended from Essau and had become racially polluted) And
behold one of the children of Israel came and brought unto his brethren a
Midianitish woman in the sight of Moses, and in the sight of all the
congregation of the children of Israel." Phinehas, a priest thrusts them
through with a javelin...so the plague was stayed from the children of Israel.
Whoredom* means to commit adultery. Strongs [2181]
Kings Chapter 10 tells us about Solomon and
his greatness, but then in Chapter 11 we find Solomon committing evil. "But
King Solomon loved many strange women" even after he acknowledged the
separation of races (Chapter 8) The word strange means "foreign,
non relative, different, alien." The women that Solomon loved were not
of his race. They were not his kindred. "and Solomon clave unto these
[strange women] in love..." Yes ye loved them, but did that make it
right? You will hear people say all the time, "but if two people love
each other than what’s wrong with different races marrying" or "It
doesn’t matter what color of skin you have as long as you have love."
That, however, doesn’t hold water against God’s commandments. Do people in
sin hate their vice? Does a drunkard hate his drink or love it? Even a pedophile
will say he loves those he defiles, yet that doesn’t make it right. God took
the Kingdom away from Solomon for his sin of adultery.
Kings Chapter 16: King Ahab takes Jezabel a
strange woman as wife. Jezabel was not a wicked Israelite Queen, but was a
Zidonian. They were descended from the Canaanities. She was a false prophetess,
not because she was a woman, (Deborah, Anna, Hulda were among the righteous
female prophets) but she was wicked because she was a non-white Heathen who
killed the leaders of Israel. It was also an abomination because God had told
the people not to have strangers rule over them.
Ezra Chapter 10: .. We have trespassed
against our God, and have taken strange wives of the people of the land..Now
therefore let us make a covenant with our God to put away all the wives, and
such as are born of them..at the commandment of our God and according to the law
(send them away) Ezra asks God, 9Verse 14) "Should we again break thy
commandments, and join in affinity with the people of these abominations?" Affinity (#2859) means "to give a daughter away in marriage."
He then goes on to recognize that God will deal treacherously with His people
should they continue their intermarriage and do not send their strange wives and
children away. Yes, today in the humanistic world it seems most cruel to send
the wife or husband away and the children also, to have nothing to do with them.
Oh how terrible some may think? But that was God’s command to right the wrong.
This was not merely a case of a man or woman being married to a non-believer
because in the New Testament we are told that if a woman has a husband who does
not believe yet is happy to remain with her than she is not to send him away,
but to encourage and lead him to Christ. Likewise, If a man is married to a
un-believer he is not to send her away if she wishes to remain, but is to bring
her into the Christian faith. No, these marriages with strange wives, was not
what the modern church would have us believe as simply believers married to
un-believers, but were mixed race unions.
"Strange Women" There have been some instances when
the Church, under Jewish influence (especially during the Dark Ages) has dealt
harshly with women and they prop up various verses such as are in the Book of
Proverbs. 16: Deliver thee from the strange woman, even from the stranger
which flattereth with her words. Chapter 5 For the lips of a strange
woman drop as an honeycomb, and her mouth is smoother than oil: But her end is
bitter as wormwood, sharp as a two-edged sword. Her feet go down to death; her
steps take hold on hell. Remove thy way far from her, and come not nigh the door
of her house: Lest thou give thine honor unto others, and thy years unto the
cruel: Lest strangers be filled with they wealth; and thy labors be in the house
of a stranger. And why wilt thou, my son, be ravished with a strange woman, and
embrace the bosom of a stranger? Chapter 6 "My son, keep thy father’s
commandment, and forsake not the law of thy mother; For the commandment is a
lamp; and the law is light; and reproofs of instruction are the way of life: To
keep thee from the evil woman, from the flattery of the tongue of a strange
woman. Chapter 22 "The mouth of a strange women is a deep pit: he
that is abhorred of the lord shall fall therein. Chapters 23: "For a
whore is a deep ditch (remember the meaning of whoredom) and a strange woman is
a narrow pit. She also lieth in wait as for a prey, and increaseth the
transgressors among men. Thine eyes shall behold strange women, and thine heart
shall utter perverse things".
Note that stranger does not refer to a
non-acquaintance, but comes from the Hebrew word, Nokri meaning an alien – not
of the same race. Again, if she had been merely a person you just met and you
lay down with her then you would have been expected to bestow on her the
covenant of marriage and convert her to Christ if she was an un-believer, but it
does not say that. It says to stay away, stay clear, and put them away – these
alien women or man had it been reversed. We have to remember, however, that it
was not customary until very recent years for a woman to go and "take"
a husband. The man in the past did the pursuing and too often he pursued the
"strange" woman.
Hosea Chapter 5 ... "And Israel is not
hid from me: for now, O Ephraim, (tribe of Israel) thou committest
whoredom, (racemixed) and Israel is defiled...they have begotten strange
children. I have seen an horrible thing in the house of Israel: there is
whoredom of Ephraim, Israel is defiled (Defiled: to contaminate, make foul)
Paul writes to us in Cor. "If any man defile the temple of God, him
shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are."
A person can defile the temple by racemixing. Verse 8, "Ephraim, he hath
mixed himself among the people" Mixed means to mingle. In the Book of
Psalms, Chapter 106 "But they were mingled among the heathen, and
learned their works" Just as we see happening today in our land
race-mixing is causing the destruction of Christianity; is making it perverse as
the Church, to satisfy the strangers, takes on Pagan, Heathen, and Humanistic
ideas.
Didn’t Joseph marry an Egyptian woman? Egypt
was founded as a white nation and as it happens through racemixing later became
corrupted. However, the woman Joseph married was the granddaughter of On a
Hebrew priest who trained in the early temples of Egypt in the ways of God and
she was racially pure.
What about Moses you may ask? Did not Miriam
and Aaron meet disfavor from God because they spoke against Moses for marrying
an Ethiopian woman? Yes indeed, God was angry with these two, however, not for
the reason you may assume. Lets say that you are speaking with a friend and he
tells you that his great great uncle married a woman from Harlem, you might
think to yourself, "Oh, my goodness, this man married a Negro. After all,
everyone knows that Harlem is populated by Negroes." Aaah yes, but you must
not forget that at one time Harlem was a white town, a white neighborhood. Or
you might think of it like this. You could tell someone you married an African,
but the fact is you married a white woman from South Africa or one of the farm
daughters of Zimbabwe. Moses married a Cushite. Cush was the son of Ham of the
son of Noah. Ethiopia is derived from Cushite. Now within the last hundred and
fifty years a very dangerous idea began circulating in the Church – again
brought on by Jewish fables which said that the Black race was the children of
Ham who was cursed. I am sure you have heard this; that the whole world was
under a flood and only 8 people survived. This causes problems because the
church must then explain how all of the other races came into being. So they
latch on to the idea that the three sons carried the genes from Adam and Eve
which all of a sudden caused the three sons offspring to become the different
races. We see the church teaching evolution again. First off, no where in the
Bible does it say that the whole earth was flooded, but rather "that
place" in Hebrew and furthermore it never says that the Black race or
yellow or red race is under a curse. They are exactly as God created them in the
6th day. This teaching has been a mainstay of the Southern Baptist
churches and helped to prop up slavery. After all they felt that slavery was
just another part of the curse of the descendants of Ham. The Jewish slave
traders readily encouraged this. Miriam and Aaron were in trouble by God for
their jealously of Moses’ greater position. They, in their jealous murmuring
said, "Hath God only spoken by Moses, Hath he not spoken by us as well".
This was not a racial issue. Moses did not marry a "strange" woman.
Also, to be pointed out is that as mentioned previously regarding Harlem, the
peoples of the earth have always been in a state of migration. Those who try to
condone racemixing will say, "what about the woman Ruth, a Moabites and
the Ethiopian taught by Philip?". Again, residing in a certain land
with a certain title doesn’t necessarily make you of that people. There are
Negro Germans and Negro Scotsman, but only because they live in Germany or
Scotland, not because they share the common blood of the founders of those
lands.
In the New Testament your church friends will share the verse
"There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there
is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus." This
is one of the favorite verses quoted by those who try to justify race-mixing.
But the verse should say there is neither Judahite nor Greek...Just as
there is strife between the white nations of Europe today as between the Scotts
who want independence from the English, or the war that arose between the North
and the South. Paul wanted to impress upon those he was speaking to that what
ever geographic nation you belong to we are all brothers and sisters in Christ.
He could just have easily said, there is neither North or South – get over
your bickering we are all Christians. Lets move forward. In Jerusalem at the
time of Christ and later in the days of Paul it was no longer a homogeneous
society.
Israel had been invaded many times and the custom in those
days was for the conquering peoples to literally remove them from their homeland
(forced migration) The majority of the people of Israel ended up migrating over
the Caucasus mountains (thus the white race is called Caucasian) into Europe. It
were these in the British Isles (means people of the covenant) and other parts
of Europe (Spain means land of the Hebrews) of whom Christ was speaking when he
said I have sheep of another fold. The forced migrations happened almost 1000
years before Christ. Those remaining in Babylon were few. Many race-mixed with
the Heathens of the land. When the Southern tribes Benjamin and Judah returned
to Jerusalem. They all went – those that were racially pure and those who had
mixed with the non-whites. It was from this period of time that the descendants
of the Canaanites and some of those who mixed with them perverted the Laws of
Moses and formed what is called the Babylonian Talmud – the Holy book of the
Jews. They went in with a temple and returned with a synagogue, went with
priesthood returned with rabbis, went with racial purity returned with strange
wives, went with scriptural economy – returned with the Babylonian money
system. The mixed Jews in Christ’s time were responsible for his death. His
racially pure children loved him and followed him enmasse.
Another scripture they like to quote is "Hath
made of one blood all nations of men" Acts 17:26 again; Paul is
speaking against the infighting of white nations and encouraging them to get
along. Go unto the Gentiles. Doesn’t this mean non-Jews. No. The word
"gentile" was not in the original Bible. It is a transliteration of
the Hebrew word "goi" singular and "goyim" plural and the
Greek word "ethnos" Translators of the early English Bibles working
with Jewish Rabbis translated 4 different words into the same word Gentile. Each
time you read the word Gentile you must look it up to see what word it actually
refers to. It could mean heathen, nation, people or another. During the writing
of the Greek Bible everyone who did not live in the land of Judah regardless of
race or religion were called Judeans and everyone else, whoever or wherever they
lived were called Hellens, which later became translated as gentiles. Jesus
commanded his disciples to go unto the gentiles (nations) his lost sheep of
another fold – those living in Europe and it is an historical fact that they
did. Many of the apostles and even the mother of Christ are buried in the
British Isles.
It is quite clear that the laws of God forbid
intermarriage of the children of Adam and Eve with any other of the other races
upon the earth. Furthermore, the non-white races are not to mingle either.
Repeated throughout scripture is the command to reproduce kind after kind and
the evidence as shown above goes even beyond that simple phrase so often
repeated in the Bible.
Today, we are in the last age, I think we can
all agree on that. The signs are there for us to see. The children of Israel,
whose identity was lost, as the Bible said it would, have been regathered into a
new place – America, just as the Bible predicted. Even the word America means
literally the government of God. Also, as predicted, there is a counterfeit
Israel as witnessed by those who "say they are Jews (Judeans) and are
not" situated in the Old Jerusalem. However, the children of Adam and
Eve, of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob were not to return to the old Jerusalem, they
would be planted in their own land "Land move no more" (not Go
Back!) 11 Sam. 7:10 but the new Jer –USA-lem. The New Jerusalem is to be a
nation of unwalled cities- the old Jerusalem as seen on any news telecast is a
walled city. From the New Jerusalem the gospel of Christ will go out unto the
world. Is the old Jerusalem sending out a message of Christ’s return and
salvation? Are they sending the beacon of light to Christians worldwide or are
they still holding on to the tradition of the elders – the synagogue of Satan
– the Babylonian system. God’s model government will be established in the
top of the maintains (North America) and is based upon the laws of God. This is
not so in counterfeit Israel. No where in the Bible does it say God’s
government or Holy city will be up in outer space somewhere but rather "And
I John saw the Holy City, New Jerusalem, coming down from God out of Heaven)
Rev. 21"And showed me the great city, the Holy Jerusalem, descending out
of Heaven from God." Rev. 21: 10
This last Church age that we are in before the
return of our savior Jesus Christ is the Laodicean age – literally translated
as the church of Human rights. This was the most wicked of the church ages –
the beast which holds up the Babylonian one-world system, with their doctrine of
multiculturalism – humanistic – beliefs. This my friends, is the downfall of
our race, Yet we know by faith, that God has not forsaken us. The white race,
although committing gross perversions and becoming wicked off and on through out
the times still has a duty to perform – to administer rulership and Christ’s
love to all the races of the earth. The non- white races of the earth will not
be blessed until they come to terms with the fact that the begotten children of
the living God are to him a "peculiar people" to be his royal
priesthood – a called out people. Can a non-white follow Christ – certainly?
The Caananite woman is a good example. She asked Christ to heal her daughter,
and Jesus said to her "Is it right that I take food from MY children’s
table and cast it to dogs" and she said "Yes, my lord, but the
dogs eat the crumbs from the masters table." And he said ye are of
great faith and THEN healed her daughter. In other words – they must know
their place and from this knowledge will come their blessings, but never while
they usurp the position of God’s holy people.
This is the great truth. This is what Satan
does not want you to know. This is why he has captured the modern church and is
using it as a tool against the true teachings of Christ and to the detriment of
God’s holy seed. He wants our people adulterated and defiled in the hopes of
putting an end to the government of God and his future right here on earth where
His sons and daughters will rule by his side. Then and only then will we have
peace on earth!
|
