Gospel
of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ
CONTENTS
1. ADAM WAS NOT THE FIRST
MAN
2. MAN AND THOSE OF THE
FIELD
3. WHAT HAPPENED TO CAIN?
4. NOAH'S FLOOD WAS NOT
WORLD WIDE
The
Addendum to Noah's Flood
5.
THE MIRACLE OF THE ORIGIN OF OUR RACE.
6. ISRAEL'S FINGERPRINTS
7. HISTORIC PROOF OF
ISRAEL'S MIGRATIONS
8. THE SONS OF GOD
9. DANIEL'S FIFTH KINGDOM
10. THE KINGDOM - OF
HEAVEN? OR IN HEAVEN?
11. THE SANCTUARY AND THE
DOMINION
12. THE STONE OF DESTINY
Editorial
Note on the Stone of Destiny
13.
AMERICA IS A BIBLE LAND
14. WHO ARE THE GENTILES?
15. THE GREAT MASQUERADE
16. THE BIBLE IS NOT A
JEWISH BOOK
17. WHO ARE THE JEWS?
18. WAS JESUS CHRIST A JEW?
19. CAN ANYTHING BE "JUDAEO-CHRISTIAN"?
20. CHRISTIANITY IN THE OLD
TESTAMENT
ADAM
WAS NOT THE FIRST MAN
Many people have become
agnostics because of the supposed conflict between the Bible and science. In
truth, there is no conflict at all between a correct translation of the Bible
and really proven science - not just unproved theories. One of these supposed
conflicts is between the fact that science knows that human beings have lived
on the earth far longer than the few thousand years covered by the Bible, and
the common belief that the Bible says that Adam was the first man. But the
truth is that the Bible nowhere says that Adam was the first man; yes, I know
that most of the preachers say that, but the Bible doesn't! It merely says
that Adam was the first WHITE man. Let us look at the record.
The many mistranslations in
the King James Version obscure much of the truth. For example. Genesis
1:1-2 - "In the beginning, God created the heaven and the earth. And
the earth was without form and void; and darkness was upon the face of the
deep." In the Hebrew, it says, "Now the earth HAD BECOME chaotic and
empty." (See Rotherham's Emphasized Bible.) That is, some early
catastrophe had wrecked the earth, which was not "without form and
void" before that. This was a judgment of God on earlier civilizations,
for their wickedness. Jeremiah 4:23-27 gives a vision of it: "I
beheld the earth, and lo, it was without form and void; and the heavens, and
they had no light. I beheld the mountains, and lo, they trembled, and all the
hills moved lightly. I beheld, and lo, there was no man, and all the birds of
the heavens were fled. I beheld, and lo, the fruitful place was a wilderness,
and all the cities thereof were broken down at the presence of the
Lord, and by His fierce anger. For thus hath the Lord said, The whole land
shall be desolate; yet will I not make a full end." Therefore, we do find
buried ruins of cities older than Adam, and skeletons which can be dated by
the "carbon 14" process as many thousands of years older. But the
Bible itself tells us about this.
Next, the Bible tells of
the creation of men. in the plural, in Genesis 1:26-28, saying,
"male and female created He THEM" (1:27), and God told these
people, "Be fruitful and multiply, and REplenish the earth" (1:28).
Pleanish is an obsolete English word, meaning "to fill"; and you
cannot REplenish what was never plenished, or filled, before. In the next
chapter, Genesis 2, we find THE ADAM (in the singular) was
created. The Hebrew word, "aw-dawm" (rendered "Adam" in
English) is from a root word meaning "to show blood in the face" or
"of a ruddy complexion" - a word obviously not applicable to the
dark races, which we also know from scientific evidence to be much older than
the White Race.
Bible scholars know that Genesis
3:20 - "And Adam called his wife's name 'Eve'; because she was the
mother of all living" - is a later interpolation, which was not in the
earlier manuscripts. (See Moffatt's Trans.)
The 4th chapter of
Genesis records the birth of Cain and Abel; in the Hebrew, the wording
suggests that they were twins. No other child of Eve is mentioned until the
birth of Seth, when Adam was 130 years old - certainly long after the birth of
Cain and Abel, which most scholars say was over 100 years earlier. Yet, when
Cain killed Abel, and in punishment was driven out of the land, he complained
to God that "any one that findeth me shall slay me" (4:14). Upon
being sent away, Cain found many other people, for Genesis 4:17 records
that Cain not only married a wife, but built a city. These were the pre-Adamite
races.
The Garden of Eden was not
a plantation of ordinary trees and shrubs. God did nothing so foolish as to
make a special creation, just to have a man to wield shovel and pruning
shears, when He already had millions of pre-Adamite peoples available for that
sort of work. We are told that the Garden of Eden contained 'the tree of the
knowledge (or experience) of good and evil." No tree of the forest has
any knowledge or experience of either good or evil. And Ezekiel 31 says:
"Behold, the Assyrian was a cedar in Lebanon, with fair branches and a
shadowing bough, and of an high stature... Therefore his height was exalted
above all the trees of the field, and his boughs were multiplied, and his
branches became long... all the fowls of heaven made their nests in his
boughs, and under his branches did all the beasts of the field bring forth
their young, and under his shadow dwelt all great nations... THE CEDARS IN THE
GARDEN OF GOD could not hide him: the fir trees were not like his boughs, and
the chestnut trees were not like his branches; NOR ANY TREE IN THE GARDEN OF
GOD WAS LIKE UNTO HIM IN HIS BEAUTY. I have made him fair by the multitude of
his branches: SO THAT ALL THE TREES OF EDEN, THAT WERE IN THE GARDEN OF GOD
ENVIED HIM." Obviously, the trees in the Garden of God in Eden were
"family trees" of races and nations, who admired and envied the
early Assyrian Empire. These made up the "garden" That Adam was to
cultivate. That is, Satan had been what we might call the Superintendent of
this planet, to rule it in obedience to God's will, until he forfeited that
position by rebellion against God. Adam was sent to take his place. It was
Adam and Eve's job to rule the various nations and races of the earth as God's
representatives here, educating them in God's laws, and enforcing obedience to
those laws. These other races and nations had been here long before Adam.
Therefore, the Bible makes
it unmistakably clear that we are not all descended from Adam and Eve, for
there were other races on earth, already old, already numerous, when Adam was
created. If you will read the third chapter of
Genesis, you will notice that, immediately after the Fall of Adam, when
God required them to answer what they had done, God condemned Satan. The word
mistranslated is the Hebrew word "naw-khash," which literally means
"enchanter" or "magician" - and, no doubt Satan, still
possessing angelic powers, was able to be an enchanter or magician.
In Matthew 13:38-39, explaining
the Parable of the Tares Among the Wheat, Jesus says, "The field is the
world; the good seed are the children OF THE KINGDOM; but THE TARES ARE
THE CHILDREN OF THE WICKED ONE: THE ENEMY THAT SOWED THEM IS THE DEVIL."
Again, in John 6:70-71, Jesus had been talking with His 12 disciples,
and we read: "Jesus answered them, Have not I chosen you twelve and one
of you is A DEVIL? He spake of Judas Iscariot the son of Simon: for he it
was that should betray Him being one of the twelve." And again, you
should read carefully the eighth chapter of John, where Jesus told
those who hated Him, "Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of
your father ye will do." He was not being vulgarly abusive, in either of
these cases, for He never resorted to name-calling for abuse. He did call some
of them "hypocrites" - which they truly were, so His statement was
precisely accurate; He did call some of them "serpents, children of
vipers" -which, again, was accurate. Long before this, they had adopted the
serpent as a symbol of Satan; that is why their tradition had given the
word "naw-khash" the translation "serpent," when it really
means "enchanter." Jesus, therefore, was telling them that they were
of their father the devil (or serpent, if they preferred that word). In this
He was simply stating a biological fact with scientific precision, and
identifying the persons of this ancestry.
Whenever someone tells you
that the Bible is in conflict with what modern science has proved true, don't
you believe it. The things that many preachers teach are in conflict with
scientific truth, as we all know; but these preachers are equally in conflict
with the Bible. Go back to the Bible, not to any man-made doctrines; and
double-check it for accuracy of translation. You will find that what the Bible
really says, in its original languages, is accurate with a precision our
scientists have not yet achieved.
MAN
AND THOSE OF THE FIELD
In these discussions, it
has been our custom to frequently review current events in detail, because
these show the fulfillment of Bible prophecies in our day. However, in
covering the subject I now want to discuss, I shall not have much occasion to
list these events in detail, and this for a definite reason. There are times
when it is not so important to count every bead on the string, as it is to see
whether they are all strung on the same string: When you learn that, you
will know where to look for the next bead. My purpose is to show the existence
of certain definite principles, which govern the events which we see
happening, as these principles have governed them for thousands of years.
For ages, it was well
understood by everyone that various nations and races had certain
characteristics, which usually would be demonstrated in the actions of these
peoples. National and racial policies and conduct developed out of national
and racial character. There were, of course, the rare exceptions; and these, a
certain type of mind seizes upon as proof that there was no general rule.
"The exception merely proves the rule." Similarly, we can note that
among crows, one bird in every 38 million is white, an albino; but this only
emphasizes the rule that all of the other 38 million crows are black.
Therefore, reasonably consistent conduct can be identified as the rule,
notwithstanding an occasional exception which surprises us when we find it.
Among the ancients, nobody
pretended to be ignorant of the characteristics of the Babylonians, the
Egyptians, the Assyrians, or the Romans, or what they were likely to do in
order to execute their purposes. Roman military ability in war and harshness
in rule over conquered peoples were well understood, and nobody was surprised
to meet them. The extreme ferocity and cruelty of the Assyrians was known to
all. Centuries of history demonstrated a consistency in these characteristics
which only a fool could ignore.
In our own times, everyone
understood that the Japanese were a warlike people, and had been for two
thousand years; therefore, only the ignorant or the stupid were
surprised to learn that Japan wanted to conquer many other nations. (However,
we had to learn by terrible, first-hand experience that the Japanese also had
the Asiatic characteristics of treachery and senseless cruelty for its own
sake. This cruelty was not just typically Japanese: it was typically Asiatic,
for we see the same traits displayed by the Red Chinese in their treatment of
the people of Tibet, as well as their cruelty to our soldiers whom they
captured.)
During both the First and
Second World Wars, those strange, alien people who are so busily brain-washing
us today to suit their own purposes, then propagandized us into
believing many hideous lies about the Germans; and from these lies, we were
expected to believe that the Germans were so inherently wicked that they were
about to invade Beverly Hills or Las Vegas! Then they taught us that
inborn, racial characteristics would be manifested in conduct whenever the
situation called for it. But now this alien Minority Group teaches us
(by corrupting most of our schools, our newspapers, our news commentators,
even many of our churches) that there are no longer any racial characteristics
or tendencies, no fixed, long-range national purposes: in short, that all
people in the world, white, black, yellow or brown, civilized or savage, are
exactly alike, as interchangeable as Ford parts. They have spent many millions
of dollars on a high-pressure propaganda campaign, designed to blind us to the
racial and national characteristics and purposes which are molding the course
of history today, as they have molded history through out all time. (It might
be well to ask ourselves, "What makes this worth so much money to them?
Just how are they planning to get back this enormous investment?")
We can get a better
perspective on present-day affairs if we view them as a continuation of
thousands of years of uninterrupted history: and if we look not only for what
happened, but also why it happened. Nothing important is a true
accident: for every occurrence there is a cause. History is usually written as
merely a list of effects; that is why we learn so few lessons from it.
We will never really understand history until we list the causes, also.
Past history, current
events, and the coming events of the future, all consist of the actions of
people. Whether their actions are good or bad, people do what they do, because
they are what they are: the kind of people who do good or bad things.
Conduct is the product of character. The man who is kind and trustworthy
by nature doesn't become a Jack-the-Ripper or a kidnapper of children: his own
nature prevents it;. and the man who is by nature cruel or dishonest will,
sooner or later, act like what he is. The dull do not become brilliant merely
because they receive legal permission to do so. And, since nations and races
are just great numbers of individual people, they will display those traits
which are characteristic of most of their people. Therefore, if we can learn
something about what kinds of people there are, this may help us to understand
their actions, even to learn what to expect from them in the future.
For their own purposes, men
and women make various classifications of things and of people: but usually, the
conclusions they wish to reach dictates the classification which will best
support it. Wishful thinking vitiates the result. On the other hand, God who
views all eternity with a single glance, has His own classifications, based
upon the eternal realities. For this, as for all other truths revealed to man,
we must look to the Bible. There, we will find that God has classified several
different kinds of beings, all of whom we lump together
indiscriminately, under the one term "men"; but God distinguishes
between them by using distinctive names for the different kinds of beings. Let
us examine them, and see if the different words used have any significance as
to the kind of people they denote, the level of character and spiritual
understanding to be found in the different kinds of beings thus identified by
their different names.
Several different Hebrew
words have all been indiscriminately translated "man" or
"men" in the King James Version of the Bible, although some very
important differences of meaning show clearly on the face of these words.
First, let us consider the word which denotes our White Race. The Hebrew word
"AW-DAWM" - called "Adam" in your Bible - is from a root
word meaning "to be of a ruddy complexion, to show blood in the
face" - obviously not applicable to Negroes or Mongolians, but only to
the White Race. When used to denote the first White Man, Adam, the Hebrew
always says "The Awdawm"; when used of his descendants, the Hebrew
just says "Awdawm." But your King James Version translates it
"man."
Another word used in
contrast to "Awdawm" is "ENOSH." It is always used
in a derogatory sense. Its root meaning is "mortal," and implies
weakness, physically or morally; wretchedness. It is applied to NON-Adamic
races, which are, of course, all PRE-Adamic. It should be noted that the pre-Adamic
races are not limited geographically to just certain parts of the earth, but
some of them are found mingled among the Adamites.
A third Hebrew word
translated "man" is "Ish" (Eesh). Literally, it means
"a male person" or "a husband." It is used for mankind in
general, and can be applied to either an Adamite or a pre-Adamite. The
feminine form is Isha (eesh-shaw); the plural of which is "naw-sheem."
This is so similar to the plural of "enosh" - "Anashim"
that they have often been confused, leading to many mistakes in translation.
There are three other,
closely related words, "gheh-ber," "gheb-ar" and "ghib-bawr,"
which are all derived from a root meaning "to be strong"; and these
are usually translated "mighty man" or "warrior." These
last three can cause no confusion, so they need not concern us further.
Now, let us note a few
examples of the use of these words in the Bible. In place of the English word
"man," I will use the Hebrew word used in the original. Ezekiel
34:31 - " And ye, My flock, the flock of My pasture, are AWDAWM, and
I am your God, saith the Lord God." Psalm 115:16, "The
heaven, even the heavens, are the Lord's; but the earth hath He given to the
children of AWDAWM." But note how God uses AWDAWM and ENOSH in contrast:
take Psalm 90:3, "Thou turnest ENOSH to destruction; and
sayest, Return, ye children of AWDAWM. "While destruction is
visited upon the pre-Adamite ENOSH for their persistent wickedness, God leads
the children of AWDAWM back to Himself in repentance.
He distinguishes between
AWDAWM and ENOSH in many places: for example, Psalm 8:4, "What is
ENOSH, that Thou art mindful of him? And son of AWDAWM, that Thou visitest
him?" Note that, while God is mindful of what the ENOSH do, it was
the sons of AWDAWM that God visited when Jesus Christ came to earth.
Both racial groups must be disciplined, but the distinction is kept clear even
there: Isaiah 2:11 says, "The lofty looks of AWDAWM shall be
humbled, and the haughtiness of ENOSH shall be bowed down, and the Lord alone
shall be exalted in that day." In 2 Samuel 7:14 we read, "I
will be his Father, and he shall be My son. If he commit iniquity, I will
chasten him with the rod of ENOSH, and with the stripes of the children of
AWDAWM." If these were not distinctly different races, there would be no
point in using the different words.
The ENOSH were wicked, and
are so spoken of. Deuteronomy 13:13 warns that "Certain ENOSH, the
children of Belial, are gone out from among you, and have withdrawn the
inhabitants of their city, saying, Let us go and worship other gods, which ye
have not known." When they gain power, they are brutal oppressors; so Psalm
10:17-18 says, "Lord, Thou hast heard the desire of the humble: Thou
wilt prepare their hearts, Thou wilt cause Thine ear to hear: to judge the
fatherless and the oppressed, that the ENOSH of earth may no more
oppress." The ENOSH have no spiritual understanding: that is the reason
for their continual wickedness. Proverbs 28:5 says, "Evil ENOSH
understand not judgment: but they that seek the Lord understand all
things." This distinction is still in effect, today: For Daniel 12:10,
speaking of the Time of the End (which is our own time), says, "None
of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand."
But this is not all. Some
races God classifies as animals Their nations are symbolized as
beasts in numerous prophecies. Do you say that this isn't what you have been
taught to believe? Then let us look into this a bit, and see what the Bible
says about it. For example, when Jonah finally went to Nineveh with his
prophecy that God intended to destroy the city for its people's wickedness,
they believed him. This is not as surprising as it may seem: for the people of
Nineveh worshiped Dagon, the fish god. Since they had heard that a great fish
had delivered Jonah on the shore, they thought he must be a prophet sent from
Dagon, and they were ready to believe him. The 3rd chapter of Jonah says
that the king was worried, "And he caused it to be proclaimed and
published through Nineveh by decree of the king and his nobles, saying, Let
NEITHER MAN NOR BEAST, herd nor flock, taste anything: let them not
feed, nor drink water: But LET MAN AND BEAST BE COVERED WITH SACKCLOTH,
AND CRY MIGHTILY UNTO GOD: YEA, LET THEM TURN EVERY ONE FROM HIS EVIL
WAY, and from the violence that is in their hands.. And God saw THEIR works,
that THEY TURNED FROM THEIR EVIL WAY, and God repented of the calamity
that He said that He would do to them, and He did it not." Now what kind
of "BEASTS" were these, who put on sack-cloth, cried to God, and
turned from their evil way? It says that this was the command for "Man and
BEAST" and that they did so. Is your dog that well-trained? Then who
was the Bible calling BEASTS?
Let us look into this a bit
further. In the 9th chapter of Genesis, God promises Noah and his
family protection; in the 5th verse, God says, "And surely your
blood of your lives will I require; at the HAND of every Beast will I require
it and at the hand of man." These "BEASTS" have hands, like a
man! But there were no monkeys in that region, so these beasts with hands must
have been men. Again, in Exodus 19:12-13, when the people of Israel
were gathered at the foot of Mt. Sinai while Moses climbed the mountain to
receive the Ten Commandments from God, God warned him, "And thou shalt
set bounds unto the people round about, saying, Take heed to yourselves, that
ye go not up into the mount, or touch the border of it: whosoever toucheth the
mount shall surely be put to death. There shall not a HAND touch it, but he
shall surely be stoned or shot through; WHETHER IT BE BEAST OR MAN, it shall
not live." Again, we find that, whether it be beast or man, it
must not touch the mountain with a hand.
The second chapter of
Genesis tells us that God is looking for a suitable wife for Adam, and
brings in review before him what your King James Version calls "every
BEAST OF THE FIELD" to see if a good wife for Adam could be found among
them. Do you really think that an all-wise God had to carefully look over a
female scorpion, a female toad, a female giraffe and a female elephant, to
decide whether one of these would be a suitable wife for Adam? Of course not!
And Moses didn't write any such foolishness when he wrote the Book of
Genesis. This is purely the work of the translators. In the original
Hebrew, the account makes good sense, and tells us much a bout the other
races.
There are two
closely-related Hebrew words used here - KHAH-EE and KHAW-YAW - each of which
means "a living creature": the meaning is far too broad to be
translated merely "beast" or "animal," for it includes all
living creatures, from microbes to men. Where the King James Version says
"beast o f the field," the word is always either KHAH-EE or KHA -YAW;
so a correct translation would be "THE LIVING BEINGS IN THE
COUNTRY." That these "living beings" include men is clear from
the same word being applied to Adam. You have read Genesis 2:7,
"And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into
his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul" In
the Hebrew it reads, "Then YAHWEH God formed THE AWDAWM out of dust from
the ground, and breathed in his nostrils breath of life; and THE AWDAWM
became NEPHESH KHAW-YAW" ("a breathing creature having
life"). So "the beast of the field" - "the KHAW-YAW of the
field - or more correctly "the living beings in the countryside" -
actually included the pre-Adamic races.
Now Genesis 2:18-20 makes
sense: God saw that Adam needed a wife; and, not condemning anybody without a
fair chance to make good, God carefully looked over the pre-Adamic races
(African and Asiatic) to see if one of them could be found who was suitable to
be Adam's wife and the mother of the new race; but He couldn't find one. In
the Hebrew, this reads thus: "And YAHWEH God said, Not good for THE
Awdawm to be alone. I shall make him an helper - AS HIS COUNTERPART. And
YAHWEH God formed from the ground every living being of the fields, and every
fowl of the heavens, and bringeth in unto THE Awdawm to see what he doth call
it; and whatever THE Awdawm calleth a NEPHESH KHAW-YAW, (a breathing
creature having life), that is its name. And THE Awdawm calleth names to
all the cattle, and to fowl of the heavens, and to every living being of
the fields; and to him hath not been found an helper AS HIS
COUNTERPART." That is, God recognized that Adam's wife must be HIS
COUNTERPART, having the same qualities of spiritual understanding, to be able
to transmit to her descendants the same qualities for which God specially
placed Adam in the world; but God could not find even one out of these pre-Adamic
peoples who was Adam's COUNTERPART, having these necessary qualities.
Before someone gets the
idea that I hate other races, let us look at this thing a little closer. The
Black Race has been on earth at least 40,000 years, for identifiable Negroid
skeletons have been discovered which can be scientifically dated as that old.
Yet in all those 40,000 years there has never been a Negro civilization. Yes,
I know that a few Negro tribal chiefs have conquered other tribes and built
themselves up a larger kingdom: but it takes more than the brutal tyranny of a
successful war-chief to make a civilization, and that was all they had. Don't
speak of Egypt; Egypt was in Africa, but never Negroid. The beautiful portrait
sculptures left by the ancient Egyptians show them to have been clearly a pure
white people; in the days of Egypt's greatness, any Negro found north of the
first cataract of the Nile River was summarily expelled on sight.
We don't hate Negroes; we
want them to be well-fed, well-clothed, comfortably housed, and in no danger
of being eaten by other Negroes - something they have never had except in a
civilization created and maintained by White Men and women. Despite all propaganda,
every Negro in the United States is far better off than those in Africa: just
try to find any who want to go back to any black nation in Africa! But neither
Negroes nor Whites will have the blessings of civilization in a nation reduced
to black standards of thinking: If they were capable of producing a
civilization at all, 40,000 years is long enough to do it.
Yes, I know that in Asia,
2,300 years ago, Confucius taught some high ethical principles - but without a
word of religion in them; and I know that the Ming Dynasty saw the production
of some nice pieces of porcelain. But what did either of these do for the
Asiatic people? Did it ever teach them how to produce enough food to fill
those fine porcelain bowls? Shouldn't 2,300 years of Confucian philosophy be
enough to develop something more than poverty, disease and misery? Again, the
Asiatic mind lacks the true spiritual understanding which God saw was needed.
Aren't the Asiatics who live in the United States better off than those who
live in Red China, Korea, or Southeast Asia? We don't hate them; but we don't
want to lose the characteristics of our race by intermarriage. This is what God was talking about in
the second chapter of Genesis, when He said that the other beings
living in the country 'round about could not produce a suitable wife for Adam,
"AS HIS COUNTERPART."
Because of the spiritual
understanding which God put in The AWDAWM, today the White Race has the
highest civilization, the greatest freedom, the highest standard of living, in
the world: they are the so-called "have" nations. We have not hated
the other races: we have tried to help them, to show them our ways. But all of
them have hated us; in the centuries when we were very few against their many,
they repeatedly tried to conquer and destroy us, but God's watchful care over
His people didn't allow that to happen, although several times they came
dangerously close to success. In lands rich with minerals, they sit in
wretchedness and poverty too lacking in enterprise to mine the enormous wealth
beneath their feet; in lands where the fertile soil and ample rainfall cover
the land with lush growth, they live in perpetual hunger, because they are too
dull to clear the land and plant it to food crops. If we provide the capital
to pay them for clearing their land and planting and harvesting useful crops,
or for digging and refining the minerals in their soil, they curse us for
"exploiting" them; but if we don't, they curse us for being
indifferent to their misery. Now, through the United Nations where they
outnumber and outvote us, they plan to rule us, plunder us, enslave us, reduce
us to their level. Well did God classify them as "ENOSH," lacking
utterly in the spiritual understanding necessary to follow God's ways.
Perhaps you may say,
"All these were quoted from the Old Testament; but in the New Testament,
God changed His mind and changed all that." So, let us see what the New
Testament says about them. In his Epistle to Titus (1:12), Paul says,
"One of themselves, even a prophet of their own, said, The Cretians are
always liars, EVIL BEASTS." The word "THERION," means "a
dangerous animal." Jude 10 says, "But these speak evil of
those things they know not: But what they know naturally, as BRUTE BEASTS, in
those things they corrupt themselves." And 2 Peter 2:12 says,
"But these, as natural brute BEASTS, made to be taken and destroyed, speak
evil of the things they understand not, and shall utterly perish in their own
corruption."
These ENOSH were commonly
called "DOGS," both in the Old and New Testaments. For example, Psalm
22 is recognized by all Bible scholars as prophetic of Jesus Christ's
first coming and crucifixion. In the 16th verse, it says: "For
DOGS have compassed Me: the assembly of the wicked have enclosed Me: they
pierced My hands and My feet." God is certainly not complaining that some
four-footed dogs barked at Him; and there is no record that any ever did. He
is speaking of those who delivered Him up to be crucified. The use of this
word is common, in the New Testament. In Philippians 3:2, Paul says,
"Beware of DOGS, beware of evil workers." The four-footed dogs are
no more "evil workers" than cats and cows; Paul and those to whom he
wrote knew that these "dogs" were the two-footed kind.
If you say, "This is
discrimination between races!" you are exactly right. Has someone told
you that monstrous falsehood, that "It isn't Christian to discriminate
between the races"? There used to be a saying in the retail industry
about the smart discriminating buyer. To discriminate does not imply anger or
hateful actions. It only means to choose between something. Let us see what Jesus Christ, Himself, did. In Mark
7:25-29, we read, "For a certain woman, whose young daughter had an
unclean spirit, heard of Him, and came and fell at His feet: the woman was a
Greek, a Syrophenician by nation; and she besought Him that He would cast
forth the devil out of her daughter. But Jesus said unto her, Let the children
first be filled: for it is not right to take the children's bread and to cast
it unto the DOGS. And she answered and said unto Him, Yes, Lord: yet the DOGS
under the table eat of the children's crumbs. And He said unto her, For this
saying, go thy way: the devil is gone out of thy daughter." Jesus Christ
certainly did discriminate; and not until the woman recognized the
righteousness of the discrimination did He help her. She had first asked help
of Him on the same basis as the Israelites, true AWDAWM. On that basis, she
was not entitled to it. Jesus told her, Let the children first be filled with
the Bread of Life; then they will establish the Kingdom of God on earth, and
from this God's blessings will be extended to such others as can understand
and receive them in the proper spirit. Meanwhile, Jesus Christ did not
hesitate to openly call the ENOSH "dogs." When the woman indicated
that she understood that the blessings would come to others out of the
abundance which God gave to His own children, then He told her that "for
this saying" He had healed her daughter.
Again, Jesus Christ
carefully warned His disciples never to make the mistake of failing to
discriminate, never to try to bring the ENOSH, who lack understanding, into
the Kingdom of God on the same terms as the AWDAWM. In Matthew 7:6, He
warned them, "Give not that which is holy unto the DOGS, neither cast ye
your pearls before SWINE, lest they trample them under their feet, and turn
again and rend you." Strong words? Yes: but the direct command of Jesus
Christ, Himself. We have disobeyed Him, and WE ARE NOW FACING THE TRAGIC
PENALTY. We have tried to treat the other races as equals: we have expected
them to learn the same lessons from our religion that we do; we have expected
them to behave with some self-restraint when they find power in their hands.
But this is exactly what Jesus Christ warned us not to do, "lest they
trample our pearls under their feet, and turn again and rend us." Of our
advanced technology, they want only to learn how to make weapons to use
against us: In fact, they are even using the very food we send them as a
weapon against us, for the surplus food will allow them to take more men off
the farms and put them into armies and weapons factories. To thus strengthen
our enemies is only a fool's method of suicide.
To His disciples, Jesus
said (in John 14:16-17), "And I will pray the Father, and He shall
give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you forever: Even the Spirit
of Truth. whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth Him not, neither
knoweth Him: but ye know Him; for He dwelleth with you, and shall be in
you." Therefore, it was logical to speak of those whose minds lacked the
spiritual understanding as "beasts," because of their nature.
The new beast - the
one world church of the brotherhood of man "deceiveth
them that dwell on the earth by means of the miracles which he had power to do
in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth that they
should make an image of the beast which had the wound by the sword, and did
live." They seek to give the United Nations world-wide empire, like
that of Babylon only greater; an empire which crushes and dominates
all nations, enforcing its will by bestially brutal forces, an empire which repudiates the one true God, where the name of
Jesus Christ cannot be mentioned because it offends those who hate Him, we see their plans for
world rule developing, we can begin to understand the dreadful prophecy of the
coming day when no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the
name of the beast...."
Nevertheless, the return of
Jesus Christ will overthrow their plans. Their power will be destroyed, and
they will be put in their proper place. This place emphatically does not
include rule over the nations: that has brought too many thousands of years of
misery and sorrow. And in the final end, when God's New Jerusalem is set up on
earth, we are told (in Revelation 22:14-15), "Blessed are they
that do His commandments, that they may have right to the Tree of Life, and
may enter in through the gates into the City, FOR WITHOUT ARE DOGS..."
and various others. This doesn't mean that you can have your pussycat, canary
and goldfish, but Faithful Fido is excluded: these "dogs" are the
ones Jesus Christ names.
The races which God created
are not inherently bad. God said ALL of his creation was good. But they
must come to some important realizations. They must recognize the
position of God's people; the white race and the authority of white men and
women. They must follow Biblical guidelines if they are to prosper. And
they must remember that God said, "Whosoever shall bless my people shall
I bless, and whosoever shall curse my people shall I curse."
Gospel
of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ
WHAT
HAPPENED TO CAIN?
"What
Happened to Cain?" is a question in the minds of many Believers. The
Bible does not trace Cain very far, and yet the fact is that Cain is a
definite historical character of whom you can learn as much outside the Bible
as you can from the Bible itself. Do not let anyone tell you that these Old
Testament people are myths. They are not. They are definitely a part of
history. The Bible states that Adam was expelled from the Garden of
Eden (Eve followed him)- eastward, evidenced by Cherubim being placed at the east of the Garden
to guard it against possible return. - If they had gone to the south or
to the west, guards at the east side would not have meant a thing. Obviously,
they went to the east; and, as we learned when we were studying Noah's flood,
Adam's migration actually took him and Eve into the Atrium Basin, in what is
today called Sinkiang, in the extreme southwestern part of China. The
migration undoubtedly took a considerable period of time. It was a long way to
walk, but they had time in those days. Adam lived 900 odd years.
In
the area where they settled, Eve gave birth to two children - Cain and Abel.
Much is lost in the mistranslations in your King James Version. Genesis
3:15 establishes the theme of the entire Bible, and all the rest of it is
a development of that theme. Eventually, God called before Him; Adam, Eve and
Satan to give an accounting of their misdeeds. Please do not get the idea, as
your King James Version and all the traditional translations tell you, that
Satan was a snake - a long scaly thing, wriggling along the ground, because
that is not what the Hebrew says. The word they mistranslated snake is "nachash',
(naw-khawsh) whose root meaning is "enchanter" or
"magician." You will recall that while Satan was expelled from
Heaven a he nonetheless retained possession
of a good deal of his angelic powers. In the course of time the angels which
were cast out with him to earth would pollute and incite the pre-adamites
against Adam and Eve and the authority vested in them. Jews (a hybrid
race - not racially pure but a mixture) came to adopt the serpent as a
symbol, an emblem of their father; and, over a period of centuries, the word
was given a secondary meaning of "serpent," which was not its basic
meaning.
Cain
murdered Abel and was expelled from that region. Referring back to Genesis
3:15 (and this is before Cain comes on the scene) God said to Satan,
"I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and
her seed," etc.
God
goes on to say "...it shalt bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his
heel." In other words, you have here, in the Bible, the first recorded
promise of the coming of The Redeemer.
Woman
had been constituted by God, in words addressed to Satan: (1) The progenitor
of the coming destroyer of Satan and his power; (2) and in her own person
also an enemy of Satan. This latter is a point of much importance to
women, and generally passed over very lightly. With such an appointment as
this to fulfill in life what would Satan, who knew it, wish done to woman,
his enemy? It is not difficult to conjecture; he would have her so crippled
she could not contend with him successfully. And then, knowing of a
Seed whose coming would be his doom, Satan would aim his sorest blows at
her function of motherhood. How he would hate her every time she
was about to become a mother!
Eve gave
evidences we have mentioned of having become one of the Household of
Faith; God had exalted her to a relation with believers equal to
Abraham's; God put enmity between her and Satan, so that she was no
longer associated with God's great enemy.
Tim.
2:15, KJV
Notwithstanding
she shall be saved in childbearing...
Women
are not saved by childbearing because not all women have children. Not
having children does not exclude women from Salvation! Although this
verse is a promise to women with regard to birthing children, there is more
to it. The woman will be saved "in" childbearing. This is the
preposition dia, a primary preposition denoting the channel or
instrumentality of an act. "Childbearing" is the the Greek word teknogonia,
a compound of two words -teknon, which means "child"
and gennao, which means "to beget, to birth." A child
born of a woman would be our savior.
Abel
brought as his offering the Blood Sacrifice. Whereas, Cain, who also had
flocks and herds, though he was primarily a farmer, brought fruits and
vegetables and dumped them down, as much as to say to God, "Well,
landlord, here's your crop rent." And then he wondered why his offering
was not acceptable to God!
Cain
murdered Abel and he was driven out "from the face of the earth." In
the King James Version it quotes Cain as saying to God, "Behold, thou
hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth" (Genesis
4:14). The implication here seems to be that he climbed into his rocket
ship and went off into inter-stellar space, which of course we know is not
what happened. He did not say you have driven me off the face of the earth.
The word earth, used there, happens to be "adamah" which means
merely "the ground, "but it had little deeper significance.
He had been a farmer, and God told him that as a curse upon him, the land -
the ground -"which hath opened her mouth to receive thy brother's blood
from thy hand.. shall not henceforth yield unto thee her strength..." (Genesis
4:11-12).
The
actual reading in the Hebrew of these verses Genesis 4:13-17 is
this, "And Cain said unto Yahweh, Great is my iniquity beyond bearing:
behold thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the land and from Thy
face I shall be hidden and I shall become unsettled and wandering on the
earth; and it will come to pass anyone finding me will kill me."
If,
as the churches teach, Adam was the first human being of any sort, then no one
was left alive at this stage except Adam and Eve (who were not going to kill
Cain) and Cain himself. Yet, he expected to be killed in the immediate future
when he ran into someone. This is simply another instance of the Bible's
recognition, in several places, of the existence of pre-Adamic races.
The
next verse says, "...and Yahweh said unto him, Therefore, anyone killing
Cain, sevenfold shall he be avenged, and Yahweh made for Cain a sign in order
that anyone finding him not smite him. And Cain went out from before Yahweh
and settled in the Land of Wandering." Your King James Version gives the
Hebrew word "Nod" - but it means wandering - eastward of Eden.
It
goes on to read (verse 17), "And Cain knew his wife (where did he
get a wife if there was not anyone else on earth in those days?) and she
conceived, and bare Enoch: and he builded a city." So, there were enough
people on hand not only to furnish him a wife, but to build a city under his
direction - "and called the name of the city, after the name of his son,
Enoch." Cain, in his wandering, traveled to and built his city in the
Tigris-Euphrates Valley district.
NOAH'S
FLOOD WAS NOT WORLD WIDE
Among
the many mistaken and un-Scriptural notions commonly taught in nearly all
churches is the idea that the Flood, mentioned in the Bible, covered all the
earth, and drowned everybody on earth excepting only Noah and his family, who
escaped death by being in the Ark. So many churches have firmly insisted that
the Bible says this--when there is ample proof that the Flood was not worldwide
- that they have destroyed the faith of multitudes of people in the Bible,
made atheists or agnostics out of hundreds of thousands of people who might
have become Christians if they had only been taught the truth about the Bible.
Part
of this mistaken idea about the Flood is due to the many mistranslations found
in the commonly-used King James Version of the Bible; but also, part of it
appears plainly to be false if you merely carefully read even the King James
Version. Let's have a look at it.
In
Genesis chapter 6, we read that God found the people so corrupt that He
regretted that He had ever created them, so He decided to wipe them out by a
flood; and He warned righteous Noah of the coming flood, and told Noah to
build a great boat, or ark, in which he and his family might find safety, and
where they might preserve a few of each kind of the animals. In chapter 7,
it tells how Noah received the final warning that the time was now at hand,
and he should move into the ark. Then it says - according to the King James
Version - "And it came to pass after seven days, that the waters of the
flood were upon the earth. In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the
second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the
fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened.
And the rain was upon the earth 40 days and 40 nights... And the waters
prevailed, and were increased greatly upon the earth; and the ark went upon
the waters. And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth; and all the
high hills that were under the whole heaven were covered. Fifteen cubits
upward did the waters prevail; and the mountains were covered. And all flesh
died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and
of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth; and every man... And the
waters prevailed upon the earth 150 days. And God remembered Noah, and every
living thing, and all the cattle that was with him in the ark; and God made a
wind to pass over the earth, and the waters asswaged... And the waters
returned from off the earth continually, and after the end of the 150 days the
waters were abated. And the ark rested, in the 7th month, on the 17th day of
the month, upon the mountains of Ararat. And the waters decreased continually
until the loth month; in the l0th month, on the 1st day of the month, were the
tops of the mountains seen."
Now,
first, let us see what the translators have done to what Moses originally
wrote. You remember that the King James Version says that the rain was upon
"the earth," and the waters increased greatly upon 'the earth";
and that "all flesh died that moved upon the earth." But are they
right in translating this "the earth"? Definitely not! Remember that
in Genesis 4:14, when God has driven Cain away in punishment for his
murder of Abel, the King James Version quotes Cain as saying "Behold,
Thou hast driven me out this day from the face of the earth." So what did
Cain do? climb into his rocket ship and take off for outer space? Of course
not! He was not driven from the face of "the earth," and he never
said so - -only the translators said so. The word Cain used was
"ad-aw-maw," meaning "the ground": God had told him that
his farming would no longer be successful, so Cain said "Thou hast driven
me off of the ground."
When
we come to the 7th chapter of Genesis, where it is talking about the
Flood, wherever it says that the Flood covered "the earth," the
Hebrew word used in the original writing by Moses was "eh-rets,"
meaning "the land" - the flood did cover the particular land
where it occurred. That is, it was a local flood which covered one
particular region or land, not the whole earth.
Again,
notice that it specifies that "15 cubits upward did the waters prevail;
and the mountains were covered." In ancient times two different lengths
of the cubit were in use: the Hebrew sacred cubit of 25 inches, and the common
cubit of 20-5/8 inches. Therefore, the waters rose above the tops of the
mountains it is speaking of by either 25 feet 9 inches or 31 feet 3 inches,
according to which cubit you use. If this meant that all the mountains on
earth were covered, the waters would have to cover Mount Everest, which is
nearly six miles high: therefore, all the earth would be covered by water six
miles deep. In that case, where could it have run off when the Flood subsided?
No, I don't mean that the Bible was that badly mistaken: only the translators
made that mistake, because they took a Hebrew word "eh-rets" which
means "that land" and mistranslated it to mean the whole world. A
little later, we shall look over the evidence which proves where "that
land" was.
But
if the whole earth was covered by six miles of water, then all nations must
have been completely exterminated. Yet Babylonian, Egyptian and Chinese
history runs right through this period without a break. The Bible gives the
date of Noah's Flood as commencing in 2345 B.C. and ending in 2344 B.C. In
lower Sumer, later called "Chaldea" (and which occupied the same
"Plains of Shinar" to which Noah's family journeyed after the
flood), the City of Ur of the Chaldees was the leading city from about 2400
B.C. until about 2285 B.C., and its history is not broken by any flood in this
period. Farther to the north, Babylon was rising to power from about 2400 B.C.
on, and reached a great height of civilization under the famous King Hammurabi,
who lived at the same time as the Hebrew patriarch Abraham (about 2250 B.C.),
and again there is no break in this history due to a flood. In Egypt, the
Eleventh Dynasty began to reign about 2375 B.C. over a great and powerful
nation; the Eleventh Dynasty ruled to about 2212 B.C., and was followed by the
Twelfth Dynasty, which ruled to about 2000 B.C. There was no break in the
Eleventh Dynasty at the time of Noah's Flood, 2345 B.C.; and the nation
continued to be large and powerful throughout this period.
Accurate
history of China begins nearly 3000 B.C. The Shu-King, historic record of
China, shows that King Yao came to the throne in 2356 B.C. - 11 years before
the start of Noah's Flood - and ruled China for many years after the Flood.
During the reign of Yao, the Shu-King reports that the Hwang Ho River (which
drains mountains and a great basin in Sinkiang province) had excessive floods
for three generations. Here, again, there was no break in history, the Chinese
nation was not wiped out, but its own records show that it continued in
existence right through the period of Noah's Flood.
Therefore,
the Bible is correct in stating that the Flood covered only "eh-rets"
- "that land"; and the translators are wrong when they change the
meaning of what Moses really wrote in the 7th chapter of Genesis, and
say that the Flood covered all "the earth."
This
leaves us ready to inquire where the Flood did occur. For this, we will have
to start with Adam and Eve, and trace where they and their descendants went.
They started out in the Garden of Eden. Genesis 2:10 to 14 tells us
that a river went out of Eden, and this river divided into four Streams. It
names these four rivers: Pison and Gihon (neither of which can be identified
among the rivers existing today), and Hiddekel (which is the ancient name of
the Tigris River) and Euphrates. The Tigris and Euphrates rise in what is
today extreme southeastern Turkey, a little north of modern Iraq. Making some
allowance for the fact that many rivers have changed their courses
considerably in the course of several thousand years, this still places the
Garden of Eden at the northern end of ancient Akkad.
When
Adam and Eve were driven out of the Garden of Eden, Genesis 3:24 tells
us that God placed cherubim with a flaming sword at the east side of
the Garden of Eden, to keep Adam and Eve from returning and having access to
the tree of life. If this guard was to accomplish anything, it must have been
placed between Adam and the Garden of Eden, so we see that Adam and Eve were
driven out to the east. From Eden, Adam's course would naturally have led him
across northern Iran, around the southern end of the Caspian Sea, into what
was formerly called Chinese Turkestan, and today is known as Sinkiang province
in the extreme west of China.
In
the southern part of Sinkiang, there is a great basin, rimmed by high
mountains on all sides, but with an outlet on the eastern end of it, through
the mountains where the headwaters of the Hwang-Ho River, the Yellow River,
rises. This basin is today nearly all desert; but it bears the evidence of a
fertile and heavily inhabited past. Explorers have found ruins of ancient
cities, uncovered by the drifting sands of the desert. Also, the known
geological structure shows that, in ancient times at least, beneath this
desert lay enormous underground natural reservoirs, caverns filled with water
- the same geological structure which furnishes artesian water in many
parts of the world today. These underground reservoirs were covered by
waterproof layers of rock, which kept the waters beneath from overflowing out
on the land surface above them. In this mountain-rimmed basin, then a fertile,
well-populated land, Adam and Eve - or at least their descendants of a few
generations later - settled.
You
who listen to this program already know that Adam was not the first man: he
was only the first man in the present White Race. Adam and Eve found this land
to which they had come already populated by an Asiatic people, among whom they
had to live. Through the following generations, the inevitable happened:
wherever there is integration, intermarriage and mongrelization of the races
follows. But if God had no purp(~ses in mind which could not be properly
served by the Asiatic and Negro races, there would have been no reason for Him
to create Adam: neither could the purposes which Adam and his descendants
were intended to serve be fulfilled by a mongrelized race. The consequences of
this mongrelization are described in Genesis 6:5, "And God saw
that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every imagination
of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually." Again, we find
that the word there mistranslated "earth" is the Hebrew word "eb-rets,"
which means only "the land" - that particular land; and there is
reason for using that Hebrew word, for this was the place where integration
and mongrelization had taken place, with its degenerative effects as compared
to the qualities possessed by each race separately.
We
find confirmation of this in the reason why God spared Noah. In Genesis 6: 9,
your King James Version Bible tells you that Noah was "perfect in his
generations" - a meaningless phrase. When anything in the King James
Version of the Bible fails to make good sense, it is a sign that you should go
behind the mistranslation and see what the words were in the original Hebrew
or Greek. The word here translated "generations" was the Hebrew word
"to-ledaw," which means "ancestry." That is, Noah was
"perfect in his ancestry" - a thoroughbred, not a mongrel. Noah and
his family were the last remaining pureblooded Adamites in (that part of) the
world: therefore, God needed to save them to carry out the purposes He had
planned for the Adamic people. The mongrelized people among whom Noah and his
family lived must be removed, or they would be a trap which would eventually
lead to the complete end of the pure-blooded Adamites. (It was part of God's
plan for one of Noah's sons to produce the line of racial descent into which
God would later embody Himself as the Messiah, and by His Crucifixion pay for
the redemption of His people; for this reason the lineage had to be kept
pure.)
Have
we any other evidence to support our view that this was the region where Adam
and Eve and their descendants settled? Yes. Remember that Adam and Eve were
driven out of Eden to the eastward. Later, when Cain murdered Abel, and as a
punishment was banished from the land where Adam and Eve lived, Genesis
4:16 tells us that Cain "went out from the presence of the Lord and
dwelt in the Land of Nod, on the east of Eden." The Hebrew word
"nod" means "wandering." That is, in the upper Tigris and
Euphrates Valleys, at the north of Eden, these rivers were running swiftly
downhill from their mountain sources: therefore, they cut themselves deep
channels in the ground; and even today, we can find the traces of the ancient
diversion dams, built by the ancients to raise the water level up close to the
surface of the ground, so they would not have to pump it so high to get it
into their irrigation canals. Farther to the south, in the lower Tigris and
Euphrates Valleys, where the slope was no longer steep, the accumulation of
silt picked up by the rivers where they ran swiftly was now settling to the
bottom of the river beds, constantly raising the level, so that every
high-water season the rivers overflowed their banks and flooded the valleys,
exactly the same as we have had in our own Mississippi Valley. These annual
floods washed away the people's houses and sent them fleeing far away to high
ground: therefore, it was correctly called "the Land of Nod" -
"the Land of Wandering." Here Cain settled, and taught the people to
build high dikes along the river banks - just as we have done along the banks
of the Mississippi River. This enabled them to stop the annual floods, so they
could now build permanent cities of good houses in the lower Tigris and
Euphrates Valleys, the land then called by its own inhabitants "Sumer,"
and later called "Chaldea." In a very few places, the Bible calls it
"the Plain of Shinar." That is, Cain went back westward from where
Adam and Eve lived. It was thus that Cain started his great empire. Yes, Cain
is a well-known historical character, not found only in the Bible (but he is
known in history under another name). He established an empire which extended
from the Persian Gulf to the Mediterranean Sea, and even took in some of the
larger islands in the Mediterranean Sea.
Another
bit of evidence is found in Genesis 11:2, which tells us that after the
Flood, Noah's descendants "journeyed FROM the east," until
they came to the land of Shinar. Therefore, they must have come from some
place east of the Tigris and Euphrates Valleys; and the only place where such
a flood as the Bible describes could have occurred, eastward from the Tigris
and Euphrates Valleys, is this mountain basin in Sinkiang which I have been
talking about.
Another
bit of evidence is found in the high-water mark found in many places along the
mountains which rim this basin, showing that at one time this basin was a
lake, extending to this well-marked shoreline. The mountains which rim this
valley were not fully covered, for many of them range from 16,000 to 25,000
feet in height, and one even rises over 28,000 feet. But within the basin are
several smaller mountains, which could be fully covered by a flood held within
the higher rim of the valley. In short, this basin, through which flows the
Tarim River, and which is sometimes known as the Tarim Basin, in southern
Sinkiang, is identified as the site of Noah's Flood.
In
your King James Version Bible, Genesis 7:11-12 reads: "in the
600th year of Noah's life, in the 2nd month, the 17th day of the month, the
same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows
of heaven were opened. And the rain was upon the earth 40 days and 40
nights." More careful translation makes clear what really happened. in
Moffatt's Modern English translation we read, "the fountains of the
great abyss all burst, and the sluices of heaven were opened." In
Smith and Goodspeed's American Translation, it says "the fountains of
the great abyss were all broken open, and the windows of the heavens were
opened." That is, a great earthquake broke up this water-proof layer of
rock over the immense, water-filled abyss or cavern beneath this Tarim Basin,
causing the floor of the valley to settle, and allowed the enormous
underground reservoir to overflow and submerge the valley
46
floor:
the great earthquake in the Himalaya Mountains about ten years ago produced
similar effects in some places. Of course, the 40 days of torrential rains
added to the flood. This filled the valley high enough to submerge the low
mountains which were inside the valley, exactly as Genesis 7:19-20 says.
Don't be misled by the mistranslation, "all the high hills that were
under the whole heaven were covered." The word mistranslated
"heaven" is merely the Hebrew word "shaw-meh," meaning
"the sky." Since this Tarim Basin is somewhat more than 350 miles
wide by more than 650 miles long, all the sky visible from anywhere near the
center of this valley would cover only this valley, and therefore only those
lower mountains which were within the valley itself, would be covered by
water.
But
what about Genesis 8:4, reading, "And the ark rested in the 7th
month, on the 17th day of the month, upon the mountains of Ararat."?
Sometimes failure to translate can be as misleading as mistranslation.
Most people understand this to mean Mount Ararat, in Armenia, some 1,600 miles
west of the Tarim Basin. But this is NOT what the Bible says. First of all,
note that it says "mountains of Ararat," mountains being in the
plural, while Mount Ararat in Armenia is only a single peak. But Mount Ararat
in Armenia was known until comparatively recent times as "Mount Massis,"
and nobody had ever heard of it being called "Mount Ararat" in Bible
times. Furthermore, the Hebrew word "ararat" means only "the
tops of the hills." Therefore, correctly translated, Genesis 8: 4
merely says that the ark came to rest upon the tops of the high hills - some
of the lower mountains which were within the valley.
A
recent newspaper report mentions an expedition, equipped with the latest
electronic equipment, which is going to Mount Ararat in Armenia to find the
Ark, and which will melt the ice which covers the Ark by coating it with black
powdered carbon. They won't find Noah's Ark, for it is not there. Several
expeditions have gone to Mount Ararat to find the Ark; some of them got within
sight of a mass on the side of the mountain which, from that particular point
of view, looked to be shaped somewhat like a ship. That point has been very
carefully inspected from the air, by airplanes flying over it very close, and
it has proved to be nothing but a ledge of rock which does give a silhouette
shaped like a ship, when seen from the right direction. I need not mention the
many places - such as the Grand Canyon, etc - where similar "ship
rocks" can be seen - and none of them are Noah's Ark.
So,
when we carefully examine the whole affair, and correct the mistranslations,
we find that there is no conflict between what the Bible really says
and either science or history. In fact, there never is any such conflict: it
is only the preachers who find themselves contradicted by either
science or history; and that is only because they either won't take the
trouble to find out what the Bible really says, or they have made the
mistranslation a supposedly sacred church doctrine, and now they are stuck
with it. Don't let any church shake your faith in the Bible: the Bible is
always right, even if the preachers are often wrong.
Let
us remember another thing: the Chinese historical record, the Shu-King,
records that during the reign of King Yao, at a time beginning about the date
of Noah's Flood, the Hwang Ho River carried excessive floods for three
generations. Drainage out of the Tarim Basin to the eastward would have been
carried off in the Hwang Ho River, and would account for this.
Now
we come to another false doctrine taught in many churches: that since nobody
survived in all the earth except Noah and his family, everybody now living is
a descendant of Noah and related by blood, no matter what race they belong to.
But we have already seen that the Flood did not cover the whole earth but only
one valley about 350 by 650 miles in size; that Chinese history was not
interrupted by it, although they do record purely local floods in the Hwang Ho
valley where the waters were draining off; we have seen that Egyptian history
is not interrupted by the Flood, so the continent of Africa was not
touched by it and the Negro race continued unaffected by it. It would be
absurd to think that Noah and his wife, both of them being White, could have
one white child, one Negro child, and one Chinese child. Remember that in Genesis
1:11-25, when God created the world and its inhabitants, and made the laws
governing their reproduction, He did not make it absurd chaos, with whales
giving birth to cattle and fish hatching out of birds' eggs: His law, several
times repeated for emphasis, is always that each creature must bring forth
strictly "after his own kind." The churches which teach this false
doctrine of everybody being descended from Noah never got it out of the Bible
- that is, in any true translation of the Bible. As Moses wrote it in the
Hebrew language, under divine inspiration, the Bible correctly tells that
Noah's descendants went out into a world already populated by people who had
lived right through the time of the Flood and were still going strong. Ferrar
Fenton's Modern English translation gives this correctly. In Genesis 10:1-5
we read of the descendants of Noah's son Japheth, and it says, "From
these they spread themselves over the sea-coasts of the countries of the
nations, each with their language amongst the gentile tribes." Genesis
10:20 tells of the descendants of Noah's son Ham, "These were the
sons of Ham, in their tribes and languages, in the regions of the
heathen." Genesis 10:31 completes it: "These are the sons of
Shem, by their tribes and by their languages, in their countries among the
heathen."
So never let anybody tell
you that the Bible consists of the fables of a primitive people. It is
perfectly consistent with all true science and all true history: it is the
history of our Race, the Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian and Teutonic White Race.
ADDENDUM
to NOAH'S FLOOD
Editor's Note: The
distinguishing mark of a real scholar is a continuing desire for additional
knowledge and a willingness to cast aside previously held concepts the moment
they are found to be false; and the honesty to acknowledge such changes in
understanding is most commendable. When Dr. Comparet wrote the foregoing
article on Noah's Flood, he placed the Garden of Eden near the headwaters of
the present Euphrates River; in other words, in northern Mesopotamia. But he
subsequently learned that the Garden of Eden was more likely located in the
Pamir Plateau of central Asia, immediately west of the Tarim Basin, and now
accepts the views of Frederick Haberman on the subject as being entirely
correct: the views expressed in Mr. Haberman's interesting and authoritative
book called TRACING YOUR ANCESTORS - and the following is taken from pages
11-14 of that book:
"Our next problem is
to discover where the Adamic or Aryan race originated. According to Scripture
it began in Eden. But where was Eden? Concerning the location of Eden we read
in Genesis 2:10-14: 'And a river went out of Eden to water the garden;
and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads. The name of the
first is Pison: that is it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where
there is gold; and the gold of that land is good: there is bdelhum and the
onyx stone. And the name of the second river is Gihon: the same is it that
compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia. And the name of the third river is
Hiddekel; that is it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth
river is Euphrates.' Because the Euphrates is mentioned here, people have
assumed that Eden must have been located on the banks of the historic
Euphrates river in Mesopotamia; but as the Euphrates and the Tigris merge into
one river, the situation in no wise corresponds to the description given in
Genesis, which states that one river went out of Eden
and divided into four heads. If we wish to accept the Bible statement as
descriptive and authoritative, we are compelled td look elsewhere for a group
of four rivers originating from one source.
"Such
a location of four rivers starting from one source we find on the Pamir
plateau in Central Asia, between the Tian Shan mountains on the north and the
Hindu Cush on the south. Cush is the original word for Ethiopia and is a word
older than the division of languages. From the lakes of that plateau issue
four great rivers: the Indus, the Jaxartes, the Oxus, and the Tarim. The Oxus
is still called by the natives the Dgihun or Gihon; the Chitral branch of the
Indus answers the description of the Pison; the Jaxartes is the original
Euphrates; and the Tarim going toward the east is in all probability the
Hiddekel.
"Concerning
this identification, Prof. S. H. Buchanan on Pages 125 and 126 of his work, The
World and the Book, quotes the great French Orientalist, M. Renan: 'If we
search to determine the country which best satisfies the geography of the
first chapters of Genesis, it is necessary to avow that all conducts us to the
region of the Imaus, where the most solid inductions place the cradle of the
Aryan race. There is found, as in the Paradise of Genesis, gold, precious
stones, bdellium. This point is that of the world of which one is able to say
with the most truth that four rivers issue from the same source. Four immense
currents of water: the Indus, the Helmend, the Oxus, and the Gaxartes, take
there their rise, flowing in directions the most opposite. The second chapter
of Genesis presents to us a traditional geography which has no connection with
the ordinary geography of the Hebrews; but which on the contrary, offers the
most astounding resemblance with the Turanian system. The Pison, which issues
from the Garden of Eden, situated in the East, is very probably the high
Indus, and the country of Havilah, seems well to be the country of Darada
towards Chachmises, celebrated for its riches. The Gihon is the Oxus, and it
is without doubt by substitution of more modern names that we find the Tigris
and the Euphrates at the side of the other rivers indicated. Thus, all invites
us to place the Eden of the Semites at the point of the separation of the
waters of Asia; at the umbilic of the world, toward which, as with an index
finger, all the races seem to point as that recognized in their most primitive
traditions.'
"Sir
Gaston Maspero, late director-general of Egyptian Antiquities in his Ancient
History of the Orient, also identifies the Pamir plateau as the
location of the Garden of Eden. Ris quotation is also taken from Prof.
Buchanan's book, Pages 124-125:
"'All
have preserved, mixed with the vague legends of their infancy, the memory of a
primitive country where their ancestors had lived before their dispersion.
This was a high mountain, or better, an immense plateau of a square figure,
and so elevated that it seemed as if suspended between the heavens and the
earth. From the interior flowed a great river, which soon divided itself into
four arms or canals, spreading out over the four surrounding countries. There
was the umbilic of the world and the cradle of humanity. The people settled
between the Mediterranean and the Tigris located this legendary country in the
East. The people of ancient Persia and India conceived its situation in the
North. The moderns have succeeded in determining its site more exactly than
the ancients had done. They have placed it in the mountains of Belurtag, near
the point where the chain unites with the Himalaya. There in effect, and there
only, is found a country which satisfies all the geographic descriptions
preserved in the sacred books of Asia. From the Plateau of Pamir, or better,
from the mountain mass of which this plateau is the center, four great rivers
issue, the Indus, the Helmend, the Oxus, and the Gaxartes, which flow in
directions the most diverse corresponding sufficiently to the four rivers of
tradition.'
"This
plateau of Pamir all the people Asia consider to be the original Eden and the
central part of the world as Prof. Renan tells us, quoted by Buchanan, Pages
123-124: 'Thus everything invites us to place the Eden of the
Semites (Aryans) in the mountains of Belurtag, at the point where this chain
unites with the Himalaya, toward the Plateau of Pamir...We are conducted to
the same point, according to Brunoff, by the most ancient and authentic texts
of the Zend-Avesta. The Hindu traditions also contained in the Mahabharata and
the Puranas, converge to the same region. There is the true Meru (Ararat) (of
the Hindus), the true Albordj (of the Persians), the true river Arvanda, from
which all rivers take their source, according to Persian tradition. There,
according to the opinions of almost all the populations of Asia, is the
central point of the world, the umbilic, the gate of the universe. There is
the uttarakura - 'the country of happiness' - of which Magesthanes
writes. There is, finally the point of common attachment of the primitive
geography, both of the Semitic and the Indo-European races.'
"The Pamir plateau of
today is of course a different place from what it was five or six thousand
years ago. At that time the whole of Asia was lower than it is today; at that
time a large inland sea covered the steppes of southern Siberia, of which the
Caspian Sea and the Aral Sea are remnants; and over the now frozen steppes of
northern Siberia roamed the mammoth and the sabre4oothed tiger. All the
indications are that northern Siberia then had a semi-tropical climate, and
ideal conditions prevailed on the Pamir Plateau. A study of our map shows that
this plateau occupies a unique position; it is called 'the roof of the world'
and forms the watershed of Asia. The plateau itself has today an altitude of
15,000 feet, and upon it stand peaks 10,000 feet higher. Four great rivers
derive their waters from the valleys or pamirs, the lakes and glaciers
of that region. The main branch of the Amu Dana or Oxus forms an outlet to
Lake Victoria, several others of its tributaries flowing also from the
plateau.. The Oxus is still called by the natives the Gihun. Both the Chitral
and the Gilget branches of the Indus have their origin close to Lake Victoria
on the southern side of the Pamirs, and
so also has the Yarkand River, which together with the Kashgar forms the Tarim
River. The Tarim river, as will be seen, has no outlet towards the sea, but
disappears in the Tarim Basin at a place that is five hundred feet below sea
level. This Tarim Basin is the greatest sinkhole in the world, although it is
surrounded by the highest mountain peaks in the world; yet its floor lies in
many places below the level of the Indian Ocean, indicating that a great
cataclysm tore the earth here in a bygone age.
"The
northern branch of the Tarim, the Kashgar River, flows out of the Alai valley
on the northern end of the Pamir Plateau and not far from where a branch of
the Oxus originates. From the same valley also flows in a northerly direction
a branch of the Syr Dana, or Jaxartes River, whose name indicates that it is
probably the original Euphrates of the ancients. The Helmend, which Renan and
Maspero identify with the Hiddekel does not have its origin on the Pamir
plateau, but starts several hundred miles south of it in a valley of the Hindu
Kush; but it is probable that the Kashgar river is the original Hiddekel,
flowing towards the East.
"Only
the Pamir Plateau answers to the geographical couditions described in Genesis
4:10, 'A lake also sprang up in Eden to supply the Garden with waters, and
from there it divided and became four rivers' (Fenton translation of the
Bible). Such a condition exists nowhere else in Asia, four streams coming from
one group of Alpine lakes, which may once have been one lake; and all the
people of Asia look with awe to the 'forbidden Pamirs' as the place of the
original Paradise. There on the 'roof of the world' is located the mythical
Taurus or AIai mountains, the legendary Chinese Qucs Kiu or Lake of
Stars and the Rang Kul or Dragon's Lake, from which the Serpent is said
to have come.
"Today
the Pamir Plateau is uninhabited. Its high altitude of 15,000 feet or more
makes it too inhospitable a place to live in: and, covering a territory of
about 180 by 180 miles, it forms a blank and mysterious spot on the map of
Asia.
"In
the next chapter we shall see that all the circumstances point to the Tarim
Basin, lying just east of the Great Pamirs, as the homeland of the Adamites;
both locations and their peculiarities make it evident that the cradle of the
Adamic or Aryan race was located in these mysterious mountain fastnesses of
Central Asia."
Gospel
of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ
THE
MIRACLE OF THE ORIGIN OF OUR RACE
Those
who hate to believe our Israel identity doctrine like to snarl at us,
"Ah, what's so special about the White Race, anyway?" They like to
close their eyes to the fact that all civilization existing in the world today
is the product of that race: what the dark people have was taught to them by
us. But I want to take up this challenge, and show that there is something
very special about our Race, altogether aside from our abilities and
accomplishments: that the very origin of the true Israel of God, the
Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian, Germanic and related peoples, was in itself a
miracle from the hand of God.
You
will remember that God first made His promises of a marvelous future to
Abraham, telling him "I will make thy seed as the dust of the earth so
that if a man can number the dust of the earth, then shall thy seed also be
numbered" (Genesis 13:16). "My covenant is with thee, and
thou shalt be a father of many nations" (Genesis 17:4); "And
I will establish My covenant between Me and thee and thy seed after thee in
their generations for an everlasting covenant" (Genesis 17:7), and
told how these nations would be a blessing to all the earth.
And then he changes Abram's racially pure wife’s name
to Sarah meaning "Princess of the multitude" - and says, "I will bless her and she shall be a mother of nations;
kings of people shall be of her."
Abraham
had 8 sons; but God told him that only his son Isaac was to be the ancestor of
the promised line, called by God to become His people, saying, "In Isaac
shall thy seed be called" (Genesis 21:12), and "My covenant
will I establish with Isaac" (Genesis 17:21). Not only was Isaac,
our ancestor, specially selected by God, but his very existence was a miracle.
Two parties are necessary for the birth of all other children - a father and a
mother; but the birth of Isaac required three parties: his father, Abraham,
his mother, Sarah, - and GOD.
A
year before the birth of Isaac, God gave him his name, in Genesis 17:21. When
God spoke of a child being born to Sarah, both Abraham and Sarah laughed at
the obvious impossibility: for Sarah was then 90 years old. and feeble with
great age - 45 years past the time when she could bear a child and, indeed,
she had been barren all her life - and Abraham was 99 years old. But God
performed the miracle He had promised, and a year later, at the age of 91,
Sarah bore her first and only child, Isaac.
This
was only the first of miracles. Like his descendant, Jesus Christ, Isaac was
named by God Himself before his birth. Jesus Christ brought the reality of
resurrection from the dead; but Isaac was used to furnish a symbolic prophecy
of our loved ones given back from the dead. Naturally, all of Abraham's hopes
were now centered upon this miracle son, through whom all of God's great
promises were to be fulfilled; then came the stunning command from God,
"Take now thy son, thine only son Isaac, whom thou lovest, and get thee
into the land of Moriah; and offer him there for a burnt offering." Did
God now mean to take away all that He had promised? No. Abraham knew better
than that: not in the awful grief of a father about to witness, even to cause,
the death of his beloved son, but in serene faith, Abraham obeyed God. He took
the boy Isaac and went to Mount Moriah, prepared the wood fire for the burnt
offering, never doubting that God would keep His promise: either God would
intervene beforehand, or God would give him back his son from the dead.
Abraham told Isaac, "My son, God will provide Himself a lamb for a burnt
offering." He knew and relied upon the assurance that Jesus Christ was
"the lamb slain from before the foundation of the world" (Revelation
13:8), the one who paid all debts and penalties for us, and gave us back
our loved ones from the dead.
As
always, God honored His word. The 22nd chapter of Genesis tells how God
did provide the burnt offering, a ram trapped in a thicket by his horns, so
Abraham made the sacrifice with the offering provided by God. Again, here is
Christianity in the Old Testament. We have nothing of our own to offer in
atonement for our sins: it is God who provides the lamb as the sin offering.
The offering of the beloved son prefigures the sacrifice of Jesus Christ as
the Lamb of God; and the fact that his promised career was not interrupted by
death symbolizes the swift resurrection of Jesus Christ from the dead, to
continue His promised work on our behalf For us, the threat of death is not
real, for God has not only promised us continued life, but has strengthened
our faith by clear demonstration of His power and will to resurrect us.
It
is very fitting that Isaac was specially chosen and called by God to be our
ancestor - as we are specially chosen and called by God to be His people and
to do His will in the earth. We are all the children of Isaac; only by a
miracle from the hand of God did he ever come into existence at all - and
remember, that miracle is our miracle too, for without it we also would not
exist today: only by another miracle from God did Isaac grow to maturity and
become our ancestor - and again, we are the product of that miracle. God told
Isaac, "I will make thy seed to multiply as the stars of heaven, and will
give unto thy seed all these countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations
of the earth be blessed" (Genesis 26:4). With all our human
imperfections, we have fulfilled this prophecy. We have brought the other
races the first sanitation they ever knew, and stopped the pestilences which
had previously ravaged their lands; we stopped their murderous tribal wars and
brought them peace, as long as we remained in command of their lands; we
brought them the only public education they had ever known; we taught them
improved methods of agriculture, and when they still were not able to feed
themselves, we sent them on many occasions the shipments of food which saved
millions from death by famine.
By
a miracle, God created Isaac for a purpose - to be the ancestor of our race;
by miracles, God brought us to the great numbers and power which He had
promised; God said of us, "They shall show forth My praise" - and
despite our human faults, we have done so.
ISRAEL'
S FINGERPRINTS
The
Bible is written about, and addressed to, God's people, "Israel." It
is the history of their past, the prophecy of their future, the law of their
relation to their God, and the promise of God's eternal care of them. The
common misconception, that "the Jews are Israel, or all that remains of
them," has made the Bible meaningless, and most of it apparently false,
to those who hold this mistaken belief. It is just as though you took a good
history of the United States, but wherever the name "United States"
appeared therein, you erased it and wrote "China" in its place. As a
history of China, it would be obviously false; but if you applied it to the
right nation, it would be clearly true.
The
Bible's history of Israel's past is known to be accurate; and its prophecies
of Israel's future have been fulfilled in every detail, down to the present
day. When the police have the fingerprints of a wanted man, they know that the
man whose fingerprints match those they have is the man they seek. Likewise,
when we find the people to whom God has fulfilled all of His promises and
prophecies to Israel, we have found Israel! Today, the
Anglo-Saxon-Scandinavian and Germanic nations have Israel's fingerprints in
every detail.
When
we realize that WE ARE ISRAEL, the Bible becomes full of meaning for us: it is
our history, it contains God's promises to US! It gives us courage to face the
terrible upheaval into which all the world is being drawn. If you will only
read the Bible with an open mind, taking no man's word for it, but proving for
yourself what the Bible says, then comparing that with what you know of
present-day history, you will see that WE are God's People Israel, and that,
however terrible the trial ahead, we will be brought safely through it when we
turn to God.
FIRST
- Let us briefly review the ancient history of Israel. God first made His
promises of wonderful blessings to Abram, changing his name to
"Abraham," meaning "Father of Nations." Note that this is
the plural - nations. God repeated His promises to Abraham's son, Isaac; and
again to Isaac's son Jacob, whose name God changed to "Israel,"
which means "He will rule with God." The root of Israel being Sar as
in Sarah meaning "Chief" implying rulership.
Israel
had twelve sons. The descendants of each son became in time a Tribe, under its
ancestor's name: thus, all the descendants of Dan became the Tribe of Dan, all
the descendants of Benjamin became the Tribe of Benjamin, etc. For many
centuries, all members of all the twelve tribes collectively were known as the
"children" - that is descendants of Israel. However, do not confuse
this with the later "House," or Kingdom, of Israel, about which I
will have more to say later.
Israel
and his twelve sons, with their families, went into Egypt, as you will
remember; and after about 2-1/2 centuries, their descendants left Egypt in the
Exodus, under the leadership of Moses. For several generations they were ruled
by "Judges" appointed by God. Later, they unwisely copied the
customs of the surrounding nations and demanded a King; so Saul became their
first king, ruling the twelve tribes as a single nation. This unified nation
of twelve tribes (like the United States of fifty states) continued until the
death of Solomon, in 975 B.C., when it broke into two nations, Israel and
Judah.
First
Kings 11-12 tells us
how Solomon finally fell into idolatry, misgoverned the people and burdened
them with excessive taxes. (Yes, they babbled about "New Deals" and
"Great Societies" in those days, too!) When his son Rehoboam
succeeded Solomon as King, in 975 B.C., the weary people petitioned him to
ease their burdens; but being vain and arrogant, and surrounded by a lot of
"bright" young Jewish advisors (even as today), he threatened to
make their load heavier. The exasperated people of the ten Northern tribes
revolted, and set up their own, independent kingdom under Jeroboam, the
son of Nebat, which is told in detail in 1 Kings, chapters 11 and 12 and
2 Chronicles 10 and 11. Rehoboam, the son of Solomon had left in his
Kingdom only the two Southern tribes, Judah and Benjamin, with some of the
Levites, who were the priests: and this Southern Kingdom was never thereafter
known as "Israel," but only as the House (or Kingdom) of Judah. The
Northern, ten-tribed Kingdom was thereafter called the House (or Kingdom) of
Israel. Just as the Southern Kingdom, Judah, took its name from the Tribe of
Judah, which was the ruling Tribe, so also the Northern Kingdom of Israel was
sometimes called "Ephraim" in the prophecies, because the Tribe of
Ephraim was the most powerful tribe in it. The histories and destinies of the
two kingdoms were thereafter separate: they engaged separately in foreign wars
and treaties, and were sometimes at war with each other, as the Books of
Kings and Chronicles record.
From
the time of this separation, 975 B.C., the Bible very carefully distinguished
between the Southern, two-tribed nation of Judah and the Northern, ten-tribed
nation of Israel. This distinction is kept clear, both in the historical
record of what is past and the prophetic record of what is to come. It
would take another volume to cover them all; but for a few examples, see the
following: the distinction is made historically in 2 Samuel 19:40-43; 1
Kings 14:19-21; 15:1-33; 16:8; 2 Kings 3:1-9; 2 Chronicles 16:1; 25:5-10; and
many others. The distinction is kept clear in prophecies in Isaiah 7:1-9;
11:12-13; Jeremiah 3:6-18; 5:11; 11:10-17; 13:11; 18:1-6; 19:1-13; Ezekiel
37:16-22; Daniel 9: 7; Hosea 1:11; 4:15; 5:9-15; Amos 1:1; Micah 1:5;
Zechariah 8:13; 10:6-8; and many others.
Just
as we must carefully distinguish between the two nations of Israel and Judah,
so also we must carefully distinguish between the nation of Judah and the
Jews.
Both
Israel and Judah were carried into captivity - but separately, and at
different times, by different conquerors, and taken to different places.
Israel was conquered by Assyria between 740 and 721 B.C., and by 715 B.C. all
of its people had been deported and resettled in what we now know as Armenia,
northwestern Iran, and the region near Baku, around the southern end of the
Caspian Sea. The Assyrians brought in other people and settled them in Samaria,
the southern half of Israel's old Palestinian land, to which the people of
Israel never returned. See 2 Kings 17. From this time onward, the
historical parts of the "authorized" or King James version of the
Bible do not record the further history of Israel; but in the Apocrypha, 2
Esdras 13:39-46 records their further journey to "Ar Sereth"
(the valley of the River Sereth, a northern tributary of the Danube River, in
modern Romania, which still bears the name "Sereth"). At the
conclusion of this deportation of Israel from its Palestinian home, the
Assyrian King Sennacherib also invaded the southern kingdom of Judah and
captured all the smaller cities in it, everything except Jerusalem. The people
of these smaller cities were deported, along with the people of the northern
Kingdom of Israel. Sennacherib's own record of this invasion says that he
deported 200,150 people from the southern Kingdom of Judah; 2 Kings 18:13 and
Isaiah 36:1, mention his capture of these cities. Thus the Assyrian
deportation of Israel included the entire population of the northern Kingdom
of Israel and a considerable representative share of the southern Kingdom of
Judah. From this time on, these people became the so-called "Lost Ten
Tribes of Israel." (As we shall see, God took good care of them, as He
had promised, and you who are reading this are among their descendants.)
The
Kingdom of Judah, on the other hand, did not go into captivity until
606 to 585 B.C., and was conquered by Babylon, not Assyria. They were deported
to the City of Babylon and settled nearby, a little south of Bagdad, in what
is now southern Iraq. Not quite all of them were deported, a few of the poor
being left behind to cultivate the land, and no other people were brought in
to settle the land. (See 2 Kings 24-25.) This Babylonian captivity of
Judah lasted 70 years, as had been prophesied by Jeremiah 20:4-5; 25:11-12;
29:10. After the fall of Babylon, King Cyrus allowed all who wished to
return to Palestine, beginning in 536 B.C. (See 2 Chronicles 36:20-23.)
Ezra 1-2 records that only 42,360 returned, and their descendants (who had
never been called "Jews" until their Babylonian conquerors gave them
that name) lived in Palestine until the destruction of Jerusalem by the Romans
under Titus in A.D. 70. This reconstructed nation, sometimes called
"Jewish" was the "70 weeks" nation with the evil destiny
"to finish the transgression," prophesied in Daniel 9:24; in
A.D. 70, those who had survived the terrible wars ceased to be a nation at
all, and became scattered wanderers in all lands.
There
is not one word in either the Bible or secular history to suggest that Israel
either was destroyed or that they went down to Babylon and joined Judah in the
Babylonian captivity, and the Jews themselves testify that the genealogy of
those who returned from Babylon shows no one from any tribe but Judah,
Benjamin, and Levi, the members of the Kingdom of Judah. To the contrary, it
was well known at the beginning of the Christian era that Israel THEN EXISTED
IN GREAT NUMBERS: Josephus' great history, "Antiquities of the Jews"
Book 11, chapter 5, speaks of them as "an immense multitude, beyond the
Euphrates River." The prophetic parts of the Bible still continue to
prophesy the great future of Israel several generations after they had
vanished in the Assyrian captivity: Isaiah prophesied until 698 B.C., Jeremiah
until 588 B.C., Ezekiel to 574 B.C., and Daniel to 534 B.C. Jesus Christ was
well aware of the existence of Israel, separate and apart from Judah and the
Jews; (see Matthew 10:5-6). Again, compare John 7:35; 11:49-52, which
cannot refer to Judah or the Jews, as the Jews were not yet
"dispersed" or "scattered abroad" and would not be for
another 40 years; only Israel was "dispersed" out of its own
land.
The
complete and permanent destruction of the Jewish nation by the Romans under
Titus, and their subsequent troubles as outcasts in every land are not a
failure of the prophecies and promises to Israel, but an accurate fulfillment
of the prophecies about the Jews. With the history of these nations in mind,
let us examine God's promises and prophecies about Israel in the Bible.
God's
promises to Abraham were unconditionaL God must fulfill them or break
His word. Consider what God said, in Genesis 12:2; 13:16; 15:5; 17:3-7, 19;
and 22:16-18: "And I will make of thee a great nation, and I will
bless thee and make thy name great: and thou shalt be a blessing: And I will
make thy seed as the dust of the earth; so that if a man can number the dust
of the earth, then shall thy seed also be numbered. As for Me, behold, My
covenant is with thee, and thou shalt be a father of MANY nations. And I will
establish MY covenant between Me and thee, and thy seed after thee in their
generations, for an EVERLASTING COVENANT. Look now toward heaven, and count
the stars, if thou be able to number them; and He said unto him, so shall thy
seed be. BY MYSELF HAVE I SWORN, saith the Lord... that in blessing I will
bless thee, and in multiplying I will multiply thy seed as the stars of the
heaven and as the sand which is upon the seashore; and thy seed shall possess
the gate of his enemies."
God
did not say that He would do this "IF" or "PERHAPS" -
these were all UNCONDITIONAL promises. Those promises which were made at Mt.
Sinai on condition that men should obey God's laws, were the promises made
through Moses, relating to health, prosperity, peace, etc. The promises to
Abraham were UNCONDITIONAL and absolute; and in the New Testament, Paul tells
us that these "the law, which was 430 years after, cannot disannul, that
it should make the promises of none effect" (Galatians 3:17). If
the Bible is true, if God's word is good, then these promises must be good.
God
repeated these promises UNCONDITIONALLY to Isaac, in Genesis 26: 3-5:
"Sojourn in this land and I will be with thee, and will bless thee; for
unto thee and thy seed I will give all these countries; and I WILL PERFORM THE
OATH WHICH I SWORE UNTO ABRAHAM, THY FATHER. And I will make thy seed to
multiply as the stars of heaven, and will give unto thy seed all of these
countries; and in thy seed shall all the nations of the earth be
blessed."
Again,
in the 28th and 35th chapters of Genesis, GOD REPEATED HIS PROMISES,
UNCONDITIONALLY, to Jacob-Israel, our ancestor: "I am the Lord God of
Abraham, thy father, and the God of Isaac, the land whereon thou liest, to
thee will I give it, and to thy seed; and thy seed shall be as the dust of the
earth; and thou shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the
north, and to the south, and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of
the earth be blessed. And, behold, I am with thee, and will keep thee in all
places whither thou goest, and will bring thee again into this land, FOR I
WILL NOT LEAVE THEE UNTIL I HAVE DONE THAT WHICH I HAVE SPOKEN TO THEE OF. Be
fruitful and multiply; a nation and A COMPANY OF NATIONS shall be of thee, and
kings shall come out of thy loins."
There
can't be an evasion of these promises; and God has always honored them. Even
when the children of Israel worshiped the Golden Calf while Moses was on Mt.
Sinai, receiving the Ten Commandments, God did not destroy them, for the sake
of these promises. (See Exodus 32:7-14.) In many places, the New
Testament recognized these promises as being still in full effect; for
example, in Hebrews 6:13, 17, "For when God made promise to
Abraham. because He could swear by no greater, He swore bv Himself.. Wherein
God, being willing more abundantly to show unto the heirs of promise the
immutability of His counsel, confirmed it with an oath." Again in Romans
11:1-2; 9:4-5; and 15:8 Paul tells us, "I say then, Hath God cast
away His people? God forbid! For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of
Abraham, of the Tribe of Benjamin. God hath not cast away His people which He
foreknew... Who are Israelites, to whom pertaineth the adoption, and the
glory, and the covenants, and the giving of the law, and the service of God,
and the promises; whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh
Christ came... Now I say that Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision
for the truth of God, to confirm the promises made unto the fathers."
SO
THESE ARE THE PROMISES OF GOD: IF THEY ARE FALSE, THEN THE BIBLE IS FALSE: BUT
IF THEY HAVE BEEN FULFILLED, THEN THE PEOPLE TO WHOM THEY WERE FULFILLED ARE
THEREBY IDENTIFIED AS ISRAEL. But the separate and very different
prophecies relating to the Jews, show that the promises and prophecies
to Israel had no reference to the Jews. Let us look at a few of them.
ISRAEL
WAS TO HAVE A CHANGE OF NAME, WHILE THE JEWS' NAME WAS LEFT TO THEM AS A
CURSE. In Isaiah 65:13-15, God tells the Jews: "And ye
shall leave YOUR name FOR A CURSE TO MY CHOSEN: FOR THE LORD GOD SHALL SLAY
THEE, and CALL HIS SERVANTS BY ANOTHER NAME." Who are God's servants? IN
MANY PLACES God repeats this: "But thou, ISRAEL, are MY servant... Thou
art My servant: I have chosen thee, and not cast thee away." For example,
see Isaiah 41:8-10; 43:1, and 10;44:1-2, 21-22; etc. This has been
fulfilled, ISRAEL is no longer called by its old name; but the Jews have
retained their name for "a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a
curse," as Jeremiah 24:9 says.
AGAIN,
THE JEWS WERE TO BE KNOWN BY THEIR FACES. Isaiah 3:9 says: "THE
SHOW OF THEIR COUNTENANCE DOTH WITNESS AGAINST THEM, as they declare their sin
as Sodom, they hide it not. Woe unto their soul! For they have rewarded evil
unto themselves." To this day, the Jew is known by his face, and even
getting his nose bobbed can't always hide it: IT IS A WITNESS AGAINST HIM -
While Israel is not so marked.
ISRAEL
WAS TO BECOME A GREAT NATION AND ALSO A COMPANY OF NATIONS, AND TO BE A NATION
FOREVER, AND TO HAVE A KING FOREVER. See Genesis 35:11; Jeremiah 31:35-37;
33:17; Psalm 89:3-4; Isaiah 9:7; Luke 1:32-33; etc., which say, "A
nation and a company of nations shall be of thee... Thus saith the Lord, which
giveth the sun for a light by day, and the ordinances of the moon and of the
stars for a light by night... If those ordinances depart from before Me, saith
the Lord, then the seed of Israel shall cease from being a nation before Me
forever... For thus saith the Lord; David shall never lack a man to sit upon
the throne of the House of Israel." Since the sun, moon and stars still
shine, these promises must be still in effect; and they cannot possibly apply
to the Jews, who never were "a company of nations" and who ceased to
be a nation at all in A.D. 70. On the other hand, Israel has fulfilled all of
this, as we shall see.
GOD
SAID THAT THE JEWS WERE TO BE DESTROYED AS A NATION, AND TO BECOME SCATTERED
OUTCASTS IN ALL LANDS. In the 18th chapter of Jeremiah, God used the
parable of the potter making a clay bottle on the potter's wheel; and on the
first trial, the bottle was spoiled; so the potter mashed it back into a lump
and tried again, and on the second trail he made a perfect bottle. God said
that He would re-make Israel into the kind of nation He wanted, just as the
potter had done with the soft clay. But in the next chapter, Jeremiah 19, God
told the prophet to get an earthen bottle which had been burned hard, and to
assemble the elders and important men of Jerusalem. Then God said: "Then
shalt thou break the bottle in the sight of the men that go with thee, and
shall say to them, Thus saith the Lord of hosts: Even so will I break this
people and this city, as one breaketh a potter's vessel that cannot be made
whole again." Again in Jeremiah 15:4 and 24:9, God said of the
Jews: "And I will cause them to be removed into all the kingdoms of the
earth, because of Manasseh, the son of Hezekiah, the King of Judah, for that
which he did in Jerusalem.. And I will deliver them to be removed into all the
kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt
and a curse, in all the places whither I shall drive them." In
fulfillment of this, after 70 weeks (or 490 years) of Daniel 9:24 were
completed, Titus the Roman General destroyed Jerusalem in A.D. 70; the Jews
were broken as a nation, and have had no king of their own. In John 19:15 they
spoke truly, "We have no king but Caesar."
Israel
was to become a very numerous people: besides the many statements of this in Genesis
chapters 13, 15, 22, 26, and 28, it is repeated in Hosea 1:10: "Yet
the children of Israel shall be as the sand of the sea, which cannot be
measured or numbered...." The "Jews" are not
numerous as the sand or stars.
For
another thing, ISRAEL WAS TO BECOME BLIND TO His IDENTITY. In Romans 11:25,
Paul comments, "...that blindness in part is happened to
Israel." This is fulfillment of Isaiah 42: 19-20: "Who is
blind, but My servant? or deaf, as My messenger that I sent?... Seeing many
things, but thou observeth not: opening the ears, but he heareth not."
You remember that God's servant is Israel. The Jews, on the other hand, are
not blind to their identity: they know their origin and their history -
although they try to fool you into thinking that they are Israel - and they
generally have succeeded in this deception.
AGAIN,
Israel WAS TO RECEIVE THE NEW COVENANT - CHRISTIANITY: Jeremiah 31:33 prophecied
it, and in Hebrews 8:10 Paul quotes it in proof of this: "But this
shall be the covenant that I will make with the House of Israel: after those
days, saith the Lord, I will put My law in their inward parts, and write it in
their hearts, and I will be their God and they shall be My people." Have
the Jews received the new covenant? Of course not! As the beloved Apostle John
said, in 1 John 2:23, "Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath
not the Father." And in John 15:23, Jesus Christ Himself said,
"He that hateth ME hateth My Father also."
The
Jews DO NOT FULFILL
ANY OF THE PRINCIPAL PROPHECIES CONCERNING ISRAEL. THEREFORE, THE JEWS ARE NOT
ISRAEL. DOES ISRAEL EXIST TODAY? OR HAS GOD VIOLATED ALL OF HIS PROMISES? YES,
ISRAEL EXISTS TODAY: FOR THE ANGLO SAXON, SCANDINAVIAN AND GERMANIC PEOPLES
HAVE RECEIVED THE FULFILLMENT OF GOD'S PROMISES AND PROPHECIES. FIRST: THEY
ARE A GREAT NATION AND A COMPANY OF NATIONS, ALL OF THE SAME RACE. The United
States is the largest civilized nation in the world; its population is
exceeded only by China, India, and Russia; it is the richest, the most
advanced, the most benevolent in its policies, and has the greatest degree of
liberty of any large nation. Between the two world wars, the former British
Empire was officially reorganized into the "British Commonwealth of
Nations"; Canada and Australia are independent nations. The
Scandinavian and Germanic nations are of the same blood, have largely the same
customs, and can be identified historically as the peoples who furnished most
of the population of the British Isles and its colonies and the United States.
SECOND: THEY ARE VERY
NUMEROUS, as the prophecies said Israel would be. In the last two centuries,
the population of the United States has increased from a mere handful to over
200,000,000 of whom about 150,000,000 are WHITE CHRISTIANS of
Anglo-Saxon-Scandinavian-Germanic stock. In the last three centuries, the
population of the British Isles and their colonies of Canada and Australia
increased from about 5,000,000 to over 70,000,000 Anglo-Saxons. The nations of
Germany, Austria, Holland, Denmark, Norway, Sweden, and Finland add
approximately 96,000,000 more. So the total number of the
Anglo-Saxon-Scandinavian-Germanic peoples is well over 300 million.
THIRD: THEY ARE A MARITIME
PEOPLE. Of the descendants of Israel, Numbers 24:7 prophecies:
"His seed shall be in many waters"; and Psalm 89:25 says:
"I will set his hand also in the sea, and his right hand in the
rivers." The world's greatest navies are those of the United States and
Britain: the greatest merchant marine fleets are those of Britain, and Norway,
(and until recently, the United States).
FOURTH: THEY ARE THE
GREATEST MILITARY POWERS. Jeremiah 51:20 gives God's word: "Thou
art my battleaxe and weapons of war: for WITH THEE will I break in pieces the
nations, and WITH THEE will I destroy kingdoms." Throughout history this
has been true. A century after being taken captive by Assyria, the peoples of
Israel (then generally known as Scythians) had bled Assyria white by their
constant warfare against it, so that Assyria was an easy push-over victory for
the Medes and Persians, just before they turned their attention to Babylon. It
was the Israel tribes on their march to Europe, as the Visigoths, Ostrogoths,
and Vandals, who crushed the Roman Empire. In 713, at Tours, Anglo-Saxon
Israel destroyed the invading hordes
of Moslems, Jews and Moors. In the 13th century they defeated the Tartar,
Mongol, "Jewish" Khazar hordes under Genghis Khan. Later they
conquered Turkey and Japan; not without heavy cost, for the promises of EASY
Victory were made through Moses and were conditional upon keeping the law. But
the promise of FINAL Victory to shatter the enemy (even with heavy cost) is
unconditional. This has been fulfilled consistently to only one people, those
whom we identify as Anglo-Saxon Israel.
FIFTH:
THEY "POSSESS THE GATES OF THEIR ENEMIES." You will remember that
this was one of God's promises we found in Genesis 22:17. Obviously,
this does not mean a wooden gate in some person's front yard, but the
"gateways" of hostile nations - the great water-ways of the world.
Consider the fact that the Anglo-Saxon nations, and THEY ALONE, have power to
close EVERY important water "gate" in the world. American and
British fleets based at Scotland, the Orkney Islands, Gibralter, Malta, Aden,
Capetown, Australia, Singapore, the Philippines, Hawaii, San Francisco and
Puget Sound, Panama, the Falkland Islands, Hampton Roads, and Iceland - these
dominate and can close the Skagerrak and Baltic Sea, the North Sea, the
English Channel, the Straits of Gibralter, the Mediterranean, the Suez Canal,
the Indian Ocean, the waters around Southeast Asia and the East coast of Asia,
the coasts of Africa and around the Cape of Good Hope, the coasts of North and
South America, the Straits of Magellan and around Cape Horn, and all trade
routes across the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans. They have proved this
by actually doing it in two world wars.
SIXTH:
THEY "POSSESS THE DESOLATE HERITAGES" OF THE EARTH. In Isaiah
49:8 God says: "Thus saith the Lord: In an acceptable time
have I heard thee, and in a day of salvation have I helped thee: and I will
preserve thee, and give thee for a covenant of the people, to establish the
earth, to cause to inherit the desolate heritages." No one else has so
successfully developed the colonies which were desolate when they first
occupied them. Compare what the United States has done in its Southwestern
States with Mexico, similar land, with fully as great undeveloped riches,
separated from us by only an imaginary line. Compare British Africa with the
African colonies of all other nations -and especially compare it with the
dismal savagery of the Negroes! Compare the development of Palestine and Iraq
while under British rule, with Turkey, Arabia, Iran, etc.
SEVENTH:
THEY HAVE EXPANDED IN COLONIES IN ALL DIRECTIONS. Deuteronomy 32:8 says:
"When the Most High divided to the nations their inheritance, when He
separated the sons of Adam, He set the bounds of the people according to the
number of the children of Israel." Genesis 28:14 says, "Thou
shalt spread abroad to the west, and to the east, and to the north, and to the
south: and in thee and in thy seed shall all the families of the earth be
blessed." Isaiah 54:2-3 tells us, "Enlarge the place of thy
tent, and let them stretch forth the curtains of habitation; spare not,
lengthen thy cords and strengthen thy stakes: for thou shalt break forth on
the right hand and on the left; and thy seed shall inherit the nations, and
make the desolate cities to be inhabited." Their colonies were
established in every sea, in Europe, North and South America, Africa,
Australia-New Zealand, and Asia. Who else has ever had such colonies? All the
ancient empires were insignificant compared to this. Since we have allowed the
Jews to teach us to turn our back on God, we have unwisely abandoned our
colonies; and the chaos in the world today is largely a result of our failure
to obey God's commands to occupy and rule the uncivilized peoples. However,
even this was also prophetic (though that is another subject).
EIGHTH:
THEY HAVE MAINTAINED THE CONTINUITY OF THE THRONE OF DAVID. David's
descendants continued on the throne in Jerusalem until King Zedekiah was taken
prisoner to Babylon, at which time all his sons were slain. But the prophet
Jeremiah took the king's daughters, first to Egypt (as we read in Jeremiah
43:6) and from there, by way of Spain to Ireland, where Zedekiah's
daughter, Tea Tephi, was married to Eochaidh, the Heremon (or Chief King) of
Ireland. Eochaidh was a descendant of Zarah, one of the twin sons of Judah;
while David was a descendant of Pharez, the other twin. Killing all of
Zedekiah's sons did not end the dynasty, as it was established law in Israel
ever since they first entered Palestine, that when a man died leaving no sons,
his daughters received the entire inheritance. The two king lines of the Tribe
of Judah were united in this marriage; and the lineage is clearly traced in
the histories of Ireland, Scotland, and England, unbroken down to the present
British Queen Elizabeth. Thus the prophecy that David's descendants should
always be on the throne over an Israelite nation has been fulfilled - and by
the Anglo-Saxon nations ONLY.
*
* * * *
This has covered but a tiny
fraction of Biblical proof that the Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian, and Germanic
people are the Israel of the Bible. Scholars have found nearly 100 prophecies
concerning israel which have been fulfilled by this one group of people. When
you consider that the United Nations now recognizes over 100 member nations,
the odds against any one nation fulfilling the first of these prophecies is
obviously 100 to 1. The odds against the same nation fulfilling both the first
and second prophecies again multiplies this by 100, making ten thousand to
one; and the odds against the same nation fulfilling the first, second, and
third prophecies becomes one million to one. Well, you figure it out; keep on
multiplying by 100 - oh, even 50 more times. But even that isn't all; a group
of nations all the same blood have done this; not a random assortment, like
China and Spain, or Egypt and Brazil, but all of the same racial group. So
this again multiplies the odds. Do you think that this could have happened by
mere accident?
And if you do think that
this was pure accident, then WHAT HAS BECOME OF GOD'S PROPHECIES AND PROMISES?
Was He too ignorant to know that He couldn't make good on His word, that all
the things He had promised to Israel never got there but were all taken by
other people? No, I don't think that God made any failures or any mistakes. He
promised and prophesied many things about Israel. They have all come to pass,
and they have all been made good to the same racial group of nations.
*
* * * *
THIS
PEOPLE HAS ISRAEL'S FINGERPRINTS
There is also the other
line of proof of the identity of these people, by tracing historically their
migration into Europe, and from there into their colonies. But that is another
subject, much longer than the one just covered.
Gospel
of the Kingdom of Jesus Christ
HISTORIC
PROOF OF ISRAEL' S MIGRATIONS
In my lecture called
"ISRAEL'S FINGERPRINTS" I have sketched briefly for you some of the
Bible's evidence that the Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian and Germanic people of
today are the living descendants of the ISRAEL of the Bible. This evidence was
in the form of many Bible prophecies of Israel's future which have been
accurately fulfilled by these nations, and by no others. If the people who
have actually done all the things which God said Israel would do, and who have
received the exact blessings which God said He would give to Israel - if they
are not Israel, how could God be so greatly mistaken? No, God was not
mistaken: He knew what He would do, and for whom He would do it; and by making
good all His prophecies and promises, He has identified these nations as
Israel.
But there are some people
who won't believe God, and will not accept His identification of these
nations. In fact, one clergyman with whom I discussed this, minister of a
church in this county, wrote to me demanding to know "what other
historians of the time, in what books, chapters and verses, record their
migration into Northern and Western Europe and the British Isles?" He is
but one of many skeptics who ask this; and to these skeptics, the answer is,
"Yes, various historians of those centuries have traced various steps of
this migration." What I propose to do for you now is to trace this
migration historically. Remember that, within the time limits which must
necessarily be fixed on such a talk as this, I can only "hit the high
spots" - you know how large a library can be filled with history books,
so I can't quote them all verbatim. But I will have time enough to show you
that the historians have traced this migration from Israel's old Palestinian
home into their European homes as the Anglo-Saxon, Scandinavian and Germanic
peoples. Not under their old names, of course: but that, also is the
fulfillment of God's prophecy that He would "call His servants by another
name," and surely you now know that the Bible identifies Israel - and
only Israel - as God's servants.
The migration of the
Israelites covered about 12 centuries, during which time they were mentioned
by various historians, writing in different languages, during different
centuries - and therefore mentioned under different names. Even today, if you
were to read a London newspaper, a Paris newspaper, and a Berlin newspaper,
all dated about the end of 1940, you would find that the British newspaper
said that in that year France was invaded by "the Germans," the
French newspaper said that the invasion was by "les Allemans," and
the German newspaper said that the invasion was by "der Deutsch" -
yet all three were talking about the same people and the same invasion.
Likewise, we must not be surprised to find that the Israelites were given
different names in the Assyrian, Greek and Latin languages. Likewise, even in
the same language, names change from century to century, just as today, we
never speak of "Bohemia," as it was called only a century ago, but
only of "Czechoslavakia."
You remember that the
original 12-tribed nation of Israel broke up into two nations upon the death
of King Solomon, about 975 B.C. The northern 2/3 of the land, containing ten
Tribes, kept the name "Israel," while the southern 1/3, containing
the Tribes of Benjamin and Judah, with many of the Levites, took the name of
"Judah" after the royal Tribe. From that time on, they kept their
separate existence until they were finally merged into a vast migration, as we
will see.
Most of the kings of the
Ten-Tribed northern kingdom of Israel were distinguished more for their
wickedness than for any ability. However, OMRI, who reigned from 885 to 874
B.C., was a vigorous and able king - although as wicked as the others - and
this reign was regarded among the other nations of western Asia as the
foundation upon which the national identity thereafter rested. The languages
of that day spoke of a family, a Tribe, or even a whole nation as a
"house" or household. If you have read your Bible much, you must
surely remember God's many references to the "House of Israel" or
"House of Judah" - meaning, in each case, the Kingdom of Israel or
the Kingdom of Judah. But the phrase was also used in those days to refer to a
nation as the "House" of a great king who ruled it. The Assyrians,
among others, began calling the Ten-Tribed Kingdom of Israel "the House
of Omri." In Hebrew, "house" was "bahyith" or "bayth"
- in English usually spelled BETH and pronounced "BETH." In the
related Semitic language of Assyrian, this was "BIT." The Hebrew
"OMRI" was in Assyrian sometimes written "HUMRI,"
sometimes KUMRI."
With this preface in mind,
let us start tracing the Israelites from their Palestinian homeland, in the
Assyrian conquest and deportation. In 2 Kings 15:29 we read, "In
the days of Pekah, king of Israel, came Tiglath-Pileser, king of Assyria, and
took Ijon and Abel-beth-maachah and Janca and Kedesh and Hazor and Gilead and
Galilee, all the land of Naphtali, and carried them captive to Assyria."
In I Chronicles 5:26 it says, "And the God of Israel stirred up
the spirit of Pul, king of Assyria, and the spirit of Tiglath-Pileser, king of
Assyria, and he carried them away, even the Reubenites and the Gadites and the
half-tribe of Manasseh, and brought them unto Halah and Habor and Hara and to
the River Gozan, unto this day."
Confirmation of this is
found in inscriptions of Tiglath-Pileser which archaeologists have dug up and
are in our museums today. One of these says: "The cities of Gala'za
(probably Assyrian for Galilee), Abilkka (probably Assyrian for Abel-beth-maacha),
which are on the border of Bit-Humna - the whole land of Naphtali in its
entirety, I brought within the border of Assyria. My official I set over them
as governor... The land of Bit Humna... all of its people, together with all
their goods, I carried off to Assyria. Pahaka their king they deposed, and I
placed Ausi as king." In confirmation of this change of kings, we read in
2 Kings 15:30, "And Hoshea the son of Elah made a
conspiracy against PEKAH son of Remaliah, and smote him and slew him,
and reigned in his stead."
The conquest thus begun in
the northeastern and northern parts of the kingdom about 740 B.C. worked
southward, down to the heavily-fortified capital city of Samaria, which was
captured about 721 B.C. Another king of Assyria reigned, by that time; 2
Kings 18: 9-11 records it as follows: "And it came to pass in the 4th
year of King Hezekiah (of Judah), which was the 7th year of Hoshea, son of
Elah, King of Israel, that Shalmanezer, King of Assyria, came up against
Samaria and besieged it. And at the end of 3 years they took it, even in the
6th year of Hezekiah, that is the 9th year of Hoshea, King of Israel, Samaria
was taken. And the King of Assyria did carry away Israel unto Assyria, and put
them in Halah and in Habor by the River of Gozan, and in the cities of the
Medes." We know that King Shalmanezer died toward the latter part of this
siege, and the final conquest and deportation was carried on by his successor,
King Sargon II. In confirmation of this, an inscription of Sargon II says,
"In the beginning of my reign, the City of Samaria I besieged, I
captured... 27,280 of its inhabitants I carried away."
The deportation of a whole
nation naturally took a considerable period of time. The journey had to be
organized, with adequate supplies for each convoy on each stage of the
journey, and proper organization of the places selected to receive them. We
know that Sargon II did not hold "the cities of the Medes" east of
the Zagros mountains until a few years after 721 B.C., so about 715 to 712
B.C. is the correct date for the deportation to Media. The places to which
Israel was deported by the Assyrians can be summed up in brief as constituting
an arc or semi-circle around the southern end of the Caspian Sea.
This deportation took in
the entire population of the ten northern Tribes constituting the nation of
Israel. From this point on, the separation into Tribes is apparently lost, and
it is as a nation that the Kingdom of Israel moved into its Assyrian
captivity.
This left the other 2
Tribes still living in the southern Kingdom of Judah. Assyria and Egypt were
the two giant empires of that day, each seeking domination over all the
smaller and weaker nations. Assyria had driven Egyptian influence out of
western Asia, back to the continent of Africa, and had made all the smaller
nations surrounding Judah into vassal states paying heavy tribute to Assyria.
The brutal and rapacious character of the Assyrians made them no friends, and
their vassal states were always hopefully looking for any means of escape from
As syrian power. Egypt kept the hope of revolt alive by offers of military
assistance to those who would rebel against Assyria. The death of a king
seemed the most opportune time for revolt, since his successor would need time
to get his power organized, and might even face some competition at home for
his throne. Therefore, when King Sargon II of Assyria died, about 705 B.C.,
revolts began in western Asia, the Kingdom of Judah under King Hezekiah taking
part in it, in the hope of military aid from Egypt (although the prophet
Isaiah warned that the revolt would fail).
The new king of Assyria,
Sennaclierib, set about recovering his empire; one rebellious city after
another was reconquered, with the hideous cruelty characteristic of Assyria;
and in 701 B.C., Sennacherib's huge army invaded the Kingdom of Judah; midway
through it, they paused briefly to defeat the Egyptian army,; then moved on to
besiege Jerusalem. None of the smaller cities of Judah were able to resist; 2
Kings 18:13 and Isaiah 36:1 say that "In the 14th year of King
Hezekiah, Sennacherib came up against all the fortified cities of Judah, and
captured them." Then followed the siege of Jerusalem, which was ended
when the angel of the Lord killed 185,000 Assyrian soldiers in one night, and
Sennacherib gave up the siege and fled back to his own land. In confirmation
of this, Sennacherib's own record of this says, "I then besieged Hezekiah
of Judah, who had not submitted to my yoke, and I captured 46 of his strong
cities and fortresses, and innumerable small cities which were round about
them, with the battering of rams and the assault of engines, and the attack of
foot-soldiers, and by mines and breaches made in the walls. I brought out
therefrom 200,150 people, both small and great... Hezekiah himself, like a
caged bird, I shut up within Jerusalem his royal city." Ancient kings
were boastful of their victories, but never of their defeats: so King
Sennacherib tactfully fails to state how the siege of Jerusalem ended. But he
does confirm the capture of all the other cities of Judah, and the deportation
therefrom of 200,150 people.
Remember that all the
people of the 10 northern Tribes were already settled around the south end of
the Caspian Sea, in the Assyrian deportation of Israel; now to them was added
a large portion of the 2 southern Tribes of Benjamin and Judah; so that the
Assyrian deportation included all of the ten Tribes and a substantial
representation from the other two. These were the people who became your
ancestors and mine, when they moved into Europe.
Over the years, the
increasing numbers of the Israelite tribes expanded northward along both sides
of the Caspian Sea. They were not basically city-builders but farmers and
herdsmen; Probably in the earlier part of their stay here, the Assyrians
sternly discouraged the building of cities, which would naturally be fortified
centers of resistance. As they were moved into this area, herded along as
prisoners, robbed of all their belongings, they had to make themselves brush
shelters or booths where they stopped for any length
|